The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
newyorker.com
The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#2Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#3If you need to revere anything, revere the achievement, not the man that did it.
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#4I don't understand why so many people insist in revering others for what they've achieved. If you need to revere anything, revere the achievement, not the man that did it.
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#5I've had things that were close, but usually devolves into multiple short 10-20 minute meetings, division of tasks, then reconvene, rinse/repeat. That typically works well and I don't have to deal with people nitpicking how I use my editor or how many chrome tabs I have open.
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#6I don't understand why so many people insist in revering others for what they've achieved. If you need to revere anything, revere the achievement, not the man that did it.
yeah this is a classic "puff piece" not really about the engineers themselves but a subtle advert for google for being a place where geniuses work. They (and nytimes, wired etc) do the same thing with Geofrey Hinton and a few other key engineers. Matter of fact it happens at other companies as well and unsure if its something the company pays for or something else.
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#7It's not like I don't like reviews or cannot work alongside another person. It's I cannot learn while someone is talking to me or trying to make me place the cursor somewhere.
I'm all in for code review, even in pairs. In fact, I do that with a junior dev I have assigned and it's working well for us. I leave him thinking and come back to evaluate his solution.
I find reviewing him paired, is time saving for me. I make him lead me to the right code spots, rather than finding out on my own. I fire 3 quick questions and we're aligned on the spot.
I'll never work again on a 100% pp position but I think I've found my sweet spot with the technique.
I agree that, if no other safeguards are in place, using pp you can avoid real bad code. But without deep thought, you'll mostly converge to an average solution, when social dynamics are very much leading.
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#8And 102 comments on HN at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18588697
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#9I don't understand why so many people insist in revering others for what they've achieved. If you need to revere anything, revere the achievement, not the man that did it.
yeah this is a classic "puff piece" not really about the engineers themselves but a subtle advert for google for being a place where geniuses work. They (and nytimes, wired etc) do the same thing with Geofrey Hinton and a few other key engineers. Matter of fact it happens at other companies as well and unsure if its something the company pays for or something else.
Re: The Friendship that made Google huge (2018)
#10I don't understand why so many people insist in revering others for what they've achieved. If you need to revere anything, revere the achievement, not the man that did it.