Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re right, medical advice from the 1870s and TikTok videos, what could go wrong? But I did “look into ‘mouth taping’” as you suggested, and I’ll bet half the page titles were “Mouth-taping: is it safe?” or “…does it work?” At what point does Betteridge’s Law of Headlines[0] kick in? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines
> You’re right, medical advice from the 1870s and TikTok videos, what could go wrong? Have you read the book? Do you think I'd be recommending something that didn't have a very strong dataset backing it? > At what point does Betteridge’s Law of Headlines[0] kick in? Nothing is easier to manipulate than digital symbols. Thus, when talking about patterns one finds in digital symbols, one much be very very careful to bu…
— Buster Baxter (written by Matt Steinglass, 2005)
People make stuff up, especially online. If you expect others to believe you about your "very strong dataset", you should provide that very strong dataset (complete with provenance).