Live data from Hacker News

Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

euronews.com

141–150 of 163 posts

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#141

Apparently Brazil only asked for Twitter/X to have a local office (so they could be dealt with inside Brazilian law) and ban like 7 accounts.

The judge threatened the company's legal representative with incarceration for a failure to comply, so Musk unappointed the company's legal representative. The judge demands that Musk now appoint a legal representative, which Musk refuses to do. Why would Musk appoint someone for the judge to incarcerate?

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well no, if someone is a habitual liar or always wrong, then you're free to assume they are lying or wrong. The ordinary opinion of random people is not a court of law where innocence is presumed.

You believe Elon Musk is always wrong? That seems like a bit of a stretch.

I'm not talking about Elon. Just making a general statement that you do not always need to give someone the benefit of doubt.

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Turkey and India is probably not the best examples humanity want to try to emulate when it comes to human rights. And this is coming from someone born and raised in India.

And yet Musk had no issue complying with local law.

Maybe he learned it was a mistake?

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The claim is that the ban request doesn't actually comply with Brazilian law. I'm no lawyer and don't know how accurate that is, but if correct that Twitter would be complying with local laws by refusing the unlawful order.

The claim by Musk (who is also not a lawyer, nor Brazilian) is that a single renegade Brazilian Suprem Court Justice has made a non compliant unconstitutional ban request. The report here asserts that every single other Brazilian Supreme Court Justice has backed that ban. You may not be a lawyer, like Musk, but I'm led to believe that all the Justices of the Braziian Supreme Court are, and that they understand the Br…

I, unlike Musk, don't have a team of lawyers though. Its common for people to attribute business decisions directly to Musk, but do we actually know he was the one and only person at Twitter involved in this decision?

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The earlier order ordered Apple and Google to remove VPN apps.

Yes, and establishes a BRL 50k daily fine for the users themselves if they circumvent the blockage by any means to get access to Twitter. To me, that's punishing the users, who have no part in the legal ordeal, for the incompetence of whatever company or agency which was supposed to block the site.

The illegal act is using X. The means to enact that is to enforce it at the ISP level. A user finding way to continue to use X is on the user. You may not agree with X being banned, but punishing the users is what should happen when they violate the law.

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm no lawyer, but the claim is that the request made by the Brazilian judge doesn't comply with Brazil's own laws. Presumably if X (not Elon) has complied with other censorship requests they found the requests to be lawful.

It's not up to X/Musk to decide that though. If they feel that way, there are legal avenues to pursue. They should always comply with the court orders, then challenge them. Not doing so is breaking the law and should be punished as such.

That really depends on leverage. The Brazilian Supreme Court really has very little leverage over Twitter (or Musk directly).

Twitter has little to gain by complying with the judge's ban before challenging it in court, but they do have a lot to lose. It'd be a different story if Twitter was being challenged by the US Supreme Court, they have mhch more leverage to damage Twitter if they don't comply.

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#147
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The issue in Brazil, based on what I read, was that Twitter’s lawyers in Brazil and Elon believed that the requests being made violate Brazil’s constitution. In Turkey and India, there was no such concern.

That is not an argument in a nation of law. If twitter thinks this is unconstitutional in Brazil, then they can by all means sue! Courts are the institutions that rule whether that is true or not, not some billionaire with a bad day.

and they did sue.

it went to court, and then the Brazilian supreme court -- and they lost.

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#148

Apparently Brazil only asked for Twitter/X to have a local office (so they could be dealt with inside Brazilian law) and ban like 7 accounts.

The judge threatened the company's legal representative with incarceration for a failure to comply, so Musk unappointed the company's legal representative. The judge demands that Musk now appoint a legal representative, which Musk refuses to do. Why would Musk appoint someone for the judge to incarcerate?

Source.

Also you can get arrested for breaking the law?

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#149
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm glad they didn't comply. I don't want social media platforms banning people just because some national government told them to.

I also don’t want companies to have to have offices in every country where they operate. X is big enough but it’s silly of Brazil to require a literal physical presence. They can serve whatever they need electronically to wherever X is these days.

It’s the law there.

Re: Brazil Court votes unanimously to uphold X ban. Users switch to Threads, Bluesky

#150

Apparently Brazil only asked for Twitter/X to have a local office (so they could be dealt with inside Brazilian law) and ban like 7 accounts.

I can't believe that no one has mentioned that one of those accounts is a sitting Brazilian Senator.

If he’s responsible for hate speech then the local law applies ?

I have seen the barbarities that some people say in Brazil . It’s an incredibly racist and classist country sometimes.

Post reply on HN