It is sometimes easy to say in retrospect we shouldn’t have demoted the story. But they did and they trusted the US Administration. Facebook is international. Do they allow all speech even that which could be viewed as propaganda in the US? Who makes the ultimate call on whether it be Russian disinformation or COVID-19? We have tried many different moderation models and not all of them work. If we try the Reddit rout…
I'm not sure if I see what you mean with the Stack Overflow idea. SO is purely a technical site, it's very easy to identify what's ontopic and everything else is offtopic. That doesn't apply to general discussion, never mind stuff like news or politics. How do you imagine that would work?
Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
11–20 of 1001 posts
Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#12It is sometimes easy to say in retrospect we shouldn’t have demoted the story. But they did and they trusted the US Administration. Facebook is international. Do they allow all speech even that which could be viewed as propaganda in the US? Who makes the ultimate call on whether it be Russian disinformation or COVID-19? We have tried many different moderation models and not all of them work. If we try the Reddit rout…
Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#13Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure if I see what you mean with the Stack Overflow idea. SO is purely a technical site, it's very easy to identify what's ontopic and everything else is offtopic. That doesn't apply to general discussion, never mind stuff like news or politics. How do you imagine that would work?
I was thinking like crowdsourced flagging and a reputation based system where users via reputation could be granted increasingly higher responsibilities as they use the site. People who post negative content would be subjected to negative feedback loops where their content would be progressively demoted, reduced visibility or encounter contribution limits. Moderation logs would become public for transparency purposes…
I fucking doubt it.
Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#15- Covid disinformation
- Some nonsense about Hunter Biden
and they're being conflated. What does Hunter Biden's laptop have to do with preventing Covid disinformation? A disease that was estimated to kill up to 30m people worldwide.
Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure if I see what you mean with the Stack Overflow idea. SO is purely a technical site, it's very easy to identify what's ontopic and everything else is offtopic. That doesn't apply to general discussion, never mind stuff like news or politics. How do you imagine that would work?
I was thinking like crowdsourced flagging and a reputation based system where users via reputation could be granted increasingly higher responsibilities as they use the site. People who post negative content would be subjected to negative feedback loops where their content would be progressively demoted, reduced visibility or encounter contribution limits. Moderation logs would become public for transparency purposes…
Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#17This whole article is really confusing. It sounds like there were two things: - Covid disinformation - Some nonsense about Hunter Biden and they're being conflated. What does Hunter Biden's laptop have to do with preventing Covid disinformation? A disease that was estimated to kill up to 30m people worldwide.
Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#18He said it is not political and published it at the end of an election cycle ... Of course it is.
Nonetheless, better late than never for Zuckerberg to admit that he and Facebook erred.
Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
#19He said it is not political and published it at the end of an election cycle ... Of course it is.
Nonetheless, better late than never for Zuckerberg to admit that he and Facebook erred.
[1] https://mailchi.mp/06871ce9876c/new-campaign-seeks-federal-f...