Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps. I wouldn't believe any statements that I learnt today before some research validating it, and even then only give a measure of confidency. Here I did that for you: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510857/ I trust NIH so my confidence that they write corresponds to truth is high even for the scientific interpretation of truth. And that's what they wrote: > Pigs were considered prion resistant as…
That article wasn't written by NIH staff. They just host a copy on their website which doesn't imply any endorsement or quality review.
Take this example of how I think: OP said, TIL that pigs are immune. This gave me misgivings.
I found a counter-proof from a government website I tend to trust, even if the material is not from them. So my confidence in the statement that pigs are immune went way down. In other words I am not sure that this statement isn't misinformation.