Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mea culpa for the recycling part then. I think the upgrade point is still huge: The MBP 2009 that I mention in my previous post has been upgraded twice (RAM and HD). That has allowed me to keep it for three years and in my opinion has justified spending that amount of money in a laptop (2000 euros at that time). I don't know if I would put the same amount if I knew I could not upgrade it.
I don't know if the European Apple-tax makes this tenable, but I just sell my MBP on EBay every year or two. A 16-month old MBP 13.3" is selling for about 70% of its original price on EBay. If you do this three times in four years, you'll have paid about as much as the original price of the machine, for about as long as you were going to keep the machine anyway, but will get little upgrades over time as Apple upgrade…
The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
291–300 of 353 posts
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#292Note: I'm not an apple fan-boy and this article seems a bit bias since his business revolves fixing hardware
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are Android phones with screen resolutions equal or superior to that of the iPhone. They may not do as well in less concrete terms like overall quality, but when it comes to common specs with numbers on them, you can do better on Android.
You cannot get an Android phone with the DPI of an iPhone 4 retina display. I'm sure you know that but you clouded the issue by referencing screen resolution.
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
The average person doesn't need 16GB of memory, and by the time they do, they need a new computer anyways.
The average person doesn't run Chrome and Gmail?
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
could you expand on the point that refurb units could be better? Also, remember that most companies get valuable manufacturing feedback by analyzing failed machines which have been "in the wild."
Based on very little information and lots of intuition reaching conclusions shared by others... Most "refurb" units are just bought-and-returned products. There's nothing wrong with them. If there is something wrong, it was a problem with a new unit (either broken at purchase or soon thereafter), someone bought it assuming "new" better than "refurb" and got a lemon; the problem is easily identified and replaced with…
My guess is that it's primarily the likelihood of failure soon after purchase which is greatly decreased.
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have an early 2008 MBP, the max supported ram is 4gb. I haven't been able to find anyone that says otherwise.
For many models, the Apple supported number and the real number is different. Usually it happens when the machine supports an odd amount of RAM (like 3GB or 6GB) that would require some wasted RAM if you wanted exact pairing. With the MBPs sold in 2008, all of them support 6GB even though Apple claims only 4GB. Go ahead and try it. If it doesn't work I'll pay for your RAM upgrade.
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
At their volumes, it wouldn't be cheaper in any meaningful sense.
That depends how you define meaningful. It obviously required more resources than simply using standard parts and tools, so there must be some payoff.
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
I deleted my post because honestly I think Apple and its future belongs to users like yourself, and that it will work out fine for everyone in the end. Just know that I have been buying a respectable number of Apple machines over the years, including three Mac Pros - which probably just confirms that I really am a member of an audience that Apple actively tries to get rid of. So yeah, I can afford a MacBook Pro. I'm…
What will you replace it with? That's my problem -- I require Mac OS X.
But I'm probably not going back to Linux (where I came from). Honestly, Windows doesn't looks so bad anymore. I admit I don't know the first thing about it, but maybe I'll give it a try.
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
> your *clunky* Dell laptop Careful, there. Your bias is showing.
I use a Dell laptop every day. I really enjoy it. Competent and well-built machine. Good value, all that. If I put it next to my wife's MacBook Pro, well, the only word for it is "clunky". Put a reasonably handsome man next to George Clooney and he'll look clunky, too.
Re: The New MacBook Pro: Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
In 2 years, the non-replaceable battery pack will be dead.
That will be someone else's problem. People will still pay a lot of money for used MBPs.
I'm sorry, but I think you are quite mistaken on this one.