[flagged]
Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
11–20 of 536 posts
Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#12[flagged]
Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#13God, I love mathematicians!
Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#14Forgive me if this is a dumb question, but isn't every vote total extremely unlikely if you make it precise to the exact number of votes? Like the chances of getting n+1, n+2... votes is roughly the same probability. For example the probability of getting [1,2,3,4,5,6] as the winning numbers in the lottery is the same as any random set of numbers.
That’s not what this article is about. Read the article.
Having read the article, I came away with similar questions and I appreciate the sibling comments clarifying.
Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#15[flagged]
Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#16[flagged]
I'm not a fan of US imperialism, but that doesn't mean you need to support any thug whose rethoric opposes the US, going so far as to deny evident reality.
Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#17Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#18Forgive me if this is a dumb question, but isn't every vote total extremely unlikely if you make it precise to the exact number of votes? Like the chances of getting n+1, n+2... votes is roughly the same probability. For example the probability of getting [1,2,3,4,5,6] as the winning numbers in the lottery is the same as any random set of numbers.
Here's an example – if I generate 10 random numbers between 1 and 100, what is more likely: all ten are multiples of 10, or at least one is not a multiple of 10?
Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#19Re: Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
#20[flagged]