Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes you think their “focus” is on emojis? This is probably just one among many things they’re doing. And it’s the right thing to do, because the political censorship of the pistol emoji is yet another example of how deeply biased tech companies have been in pushing their politics onto customers.
There's zero cost to leaving the emoji as it is. The designer of the new version claims he's still working on it , so I don't know how you can say it's not a "focus". It's a waste of time and money for purely ideological reasons.
X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
61–70 of 322 posts
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#62[flagged]
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#63Great to see this change. The decision to get rid of the gun emoji was itself an act of political activism, highlighting the left leaning bias in many of these organizations - or at least the power given to the voices that pushed for those changes. It was a naked way to influence the culture around guns, and make them less visible. But it also killed funny uses of the actual pistol emoji. For the record, the underlyi…
https://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-list.html
#1121
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#64This is exactly as stupid as changing it to a water pistol in the first place was
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#65Does this retroactively change the meaning of the emoji people used, or is it only applying to future use of the emoji? (That would be a fun legal hypothetical.)
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#66Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's zero cost to leaving the emoji as it is. The designer of the new version claims he's still working on it , so I don't know how you can say it's not a "focus". It's a waste of time and money for purely ideological reasons.
The change to the water gun was for ideological reasons. This is returning to the original. Without being the project manager, you're speculating on the amount of focus this had.
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#68This is exactly as stupid as changing it to a water pistol in the first place was
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's zero cost to leaving the emoji as it is. The designer of the new version claims he's still working on it , so I don't know how you can say it's not a "focus". It's a waste of time and money for purely ideological reasons.
The change to the water gun was for ideological reasons. This is returning to the original. Without being the project manager, you're speculating on the amount of focus this had.
Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes you think their “focus” is on emojis? This is probably just one among many things they’re doing. And it’s the right thing to do, because the political censorship of the pistol emoji is yet another example of how deeply biased tech companies have been in pushing their politics onto customers.
The gun emoji is used to make death threats etcetera. Why do you want that on a social media platform? It's not politics, it's just decency.