Live data from Hacker News

X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm

blog.emojipedia.org

61–70 of 322 posts

Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What makes you think their “focus” is on emojis? This is probably just one among many things they’re doing. And it’s the right thing to do, because the political censorship of the pistol emoji is yet another example of how deeply biased tech companies have been in pushing their politics onto customers.

There's zero cost to leaving the emoji as it is. The designer of the new version claims he's still working on it , so I don't know how you can say it's not a "focus". It's a waste of time and money for purely ideological reasons.

Funny. You could make the same argument about the change to water gun.

Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm

#63

Great to see this change. The decision to get rid of the gun emoji was itself an act of political activism, highlighting the left leaning bias in many of these organizations - or at least the power given to the voices that pushed for those changes. It was a naked way to influence the culture around guns, and make them less visible. But it also killed funny uses of the actual pistol emoji. For the record, the underlyi…

Its slow, but I'm pretty sure Unicode updated name.

https://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-list.html

#1121

Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm

#64

This is exactly as stupid as changing it to a water pistol in the first place was

Indeed, this is very 1984. Changing the meaning of a word, people express their thoughts with emojis, the meaning (representation in this case) should never be altered in such way.

Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's zero cost to leaving the emoji as it is. The designer of the new version claims he's still working on it , so I don't know how you can say it's not a "focus". It's a waste of time and money for purely ideological reasons.

The change to the water gun was for ideological reasons. This is returning to the original. Without being the project manager, you're speculating on the amount of focus this had.

[flagged]

Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's zero cost to leaving the emoji as it is. The designer of the new version claims he's still working on it , so I don't know how you can say it's not a "focus". It's a waste of time and money for purely ideological reasons.

The change to the water gun was for ideological reasons. This is returning to the original. Without being the project manager, you're speculating on the amount of focus this had.

It's not a git revert. It is active effort to create a new emoji. There's zero cost to leaving it alone, there's material cost to changing it. Last time I checked, that's a bad way for a company that nearly went out of business to prioritize.

Re: X redesigns water pistol emoji back to a firearm

#70
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What makes you think their “focus” is on emojis? This is probably just one among many things they’re doing. And it’s the right thing to do, because the political censorship of the pistol emoji is yet another example of how deeply biased tech companies have been in pushing their politics onto customers.

The gun emoji is used to make death threats etcetera. Why do you want that on a social media platform? It's not politics, it's just decency.

Right, because changing it to a "water gun" fixes that problem
Post reply on HN