Live data from Hacker News

Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

timhulsizer.com

81–90 of 132 posts

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#81
post #40

Calvin and Hobbes was a source of happiness during a mostly miserable adolescence. My world is better for Bill Watterson having been in it, even if he'll never know that himself.

Yes, I was a little older but Calvin and Hobbes is my all time favorite comic. I don't even read the comics anymore, since I haven't subscribed to a printed newspaper in a long time. The whole ritual of sitting down with a cup of coffee and reading through the Sunday paper is something I still miss from time to time.

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#82
post #40

Calvin and Hobbes was a source of happiness during a mostly miserable adolescence. My world is better for Bill Watterson having been in it, even if he'll never know that himself.

Your words were so simple, but hit me in a place I did not expect. I also had a miserable childhood/adolescence, and I could not help but cry a little reading your words. I feel exactly the same way.

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#83
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is a utopia that "actually works"? Star Trek is "What if Communism but it wasn't influenced by human nature?", and totally avoided thinking about how the trillions of humans not in the military lived.

> Star Trek is "What if Communism but it wasn't influenced by human nature On the contrary, the very premise of Star Trek is "what if humans overcome the bad parts of their nature, and embraced the good ones". The core concept of the entire franchise, coming from Gene himself, is that humanity must be recognizably human to the audience, just better than what it is now . The Federation being fully automated communist…

Yeah, that really is its fatal flaw.

The only really good Star Trek series I saw was DS9. It was darker, had longer story arcs, religion and fully developed characters. There was even a scene that illustrated this, where Captain Sisko was talking with an Earth politician and telling him that the problem was he lived on Earth, a paradise, and couldn't understand the war and problems those near DS9 faced.

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#85
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The Nobel Prize in Literature is awarded for producing "the most outstanding work in an idealistic direction" with "the greatest benefit on mankind". They should award one posthumously to Gene Roddenberry then. After all, the Federation from Star Trek is pretty much the only well-known case of an utopia that actually works in fiction writing, and the show itself is one of few examples of aspirational and inspiratio…

What is a utopia that "actually works"? Star Trek is "What if Communism but it wasn't influenced by human nature?", and totally avoided thinking about how the trillions of humans not in the military lived.

You don’t need to overcome all of human nature, you “just” need to overcome greed and solve scarcity. I put “just” in quotes because I recognize those are a tall order, but I don’t think you really need much else to have a Star Trek collectivist utopia.

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve read the “mysteries” book too, and would recommend. I think it’s the first book from Waterson since stopping Calvin and Hobbs. It’s quite different from Calvin and Hobbs, heavier but really thought provoking. I found myself thinking about the story after the fact.

To each their own, but the book would never have sold any copies if Bill's name wasn't attached to it. I purchased a copy on Amazon and thought I was hoodwinked. It felt like a pure cash grab.

Did you just, like, purchase it without having any concept of what it was? It's certainly different from Calvin and Hobbes, but there was no indication that it wouldn't be. Making a fairly artistic book with niche appeal is actually the opposite of a cash grab.

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#87

I was a teenager in the 80s. I can remember going outside in the dark before school to get the paper so I could read C&H during breakfast. I didn’t know at the time that they would someday be reprinted in books, so I would cut each one out and tape it into a notebook. The other main comic strip I enjoyed at that time was The Far Side. Recently I reread both Calvin and Hobbes and the Far Side. Calvin and Hobbes is sti…

The Far Side scratches a weird kid itch really really well. I bought the entire collection for my kid. Their okay, but not as good as I remember. He was dying laughing as he read them.

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#89
post #7

Fishing the comics section out of the Sunday paper to read a big Calvin and Hobbes strip was a joy. At the peak of the era, our paper (The Washington Post) actually had two separate comics sections, one with C&H on the front and the other with Peanuts. There was also Doonesbury and Bloom County, many other lesser strips, and even magazines like Parade and Potomac, all of which together provided a full morning’s enter…

The genesis of the Post's gigantic comics section (three full pages on weekdays, if I remember correctly) was that they picked up all of the comics that had been run by the Washington Star when the Star (along with all the other evening papers) finally ran out of steam and closed up shop.

Re: Introduction to Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995 (2001)

#90
post #53

My sister just came to visit me in Tokyo and asked what to bring as a gift... I said, "If you can, please bring my Calvin and Hobbes collection for my kids to read." My 10 and 6 year olds have been devouring them ever since. There is something electric and timeless about these strips. I am certain they don't understand all of the vocabulary but still they read it. It is a format that lures kids in and then uses that…

I have a nephew turning six this year and have been considering getting him some of the collections as well, wondering if it would have the same formative impact on him as on me. I remember reading the strip in the paper as a six-year-old blonde kid and coming away with the impression that there was nothing weird about daydreaming all the time, or being articulate, or having an aversion to team sports, etc. all of which traits I carry with me to this day, 30-ish years later. Of course, now I find myself identifying more with Calvin's dad - that's life, I guess!
Post reply on HN