Helpful context on the validity of this heavily editorialized site. Seems like Apple definitely is not in the right here but very unclear if it has anything to do with this persons claims. If you follow her history of forming complaints it is hard to take her serious as most of her complaints get dropped and these are complaints filed against different agencies.
US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
181–190 of 331 posts
Re: US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
#182Re: US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
#183[flagged]
A quick search didn't find anything. Any links to further info?
Note that this is separate from the stormwater issue that people will try to misdirect about
Re: US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "One thing is for sure, it's not a silicon fab." Why do you say that? Yes, the EPA report seems to be redacted to obscure what they're actually doing there. But there are multiple reports, some from Apple employees, that refer to it as a being some sort of small scale, "skunkworks" silicon fab.
> Why do you say that? Mainly because Apple's custom silicon could not even be prototyped in a small scale facility. It'd likely be in Taiwan. > But there are multiple reports, some from Apple employees, that refer to it as a being some sort of small scale, "skunkworks" silicon fab. I apologize if I missed them. Please highlight. Curious of the credentials of the folks reporting such a thing, as well.
Re: US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
#185Reminds me of Minamata, Japanese company was dumping mercury into the nearby lakes and hushing everything up. Movie is great BTW, thank fk I don't live near a chemical plant. Apple started to clean up only after getting tipped off of an EPA raid. They also didn't test or analyse chemicals. And conveniently stopped having weekly inspections. Truly a case of ignorance is bliss. Huh, toxic what now? No no it's NOT toxic…
The one thing I found most disgusting, though, was the open tank in the basement. They said the tank would explode if they left it closed, so VOCs must have been venting out. But they left it open in... the basement... without any REAL ventilation. This belongs on r/OSHA.
Re: US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
#186I wonder why this post was flagged.
Re: US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you contacted the EPA? This sounds like a violation of the clean air act. Your county enforcement might have limited powers vs what the EPA can do.
I've contacted the EPA and they said contact the county. It seems they want to see a county report before they get involved.
Re: US EPA Enforcement and Compliance on Apple Fabrication
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is in line of when I worked in a semiconductor lab in suburban UK in the 90s. We had a couple of local residents report problems immediately even though we hadn't even started fabrication at that point. They eventually sent out a press release saying that we had moved manufacturing to Scotland. The complaints stopped instantly. The lab was running until at least 2017 with no complaints and regular inspections fr…
EPA isn't the only governing body. It says right in their report the facility is being properly managed by the city of Santa Clara and the state of California. Also, they weren't doing chip fab there. It was R&D for Titan and MicroLED. There's a reason she's litigating her case against Apple pro se and without any expert witnesses and other lawyers. She's a basket case who went from almost fainting one time to now sa…