Live data from Hacker News

Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

apple.com

411–420 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#411
post #83

While I think it's cool and I appreciate Apple crafting better stories on why this is helpful, I still think for the everyday person, they won't really care if it's AI or not.

If Apple does a really good job of this, then the everyday person probably shouldn't care if it's AI or not.

Who cares how your flight information shows up at the right time in the right place? the only thing that should matter is that it does.

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#412
post #334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I always saw this level of personal intelligence to come about at some point, but I didn’t expect Apple to hit it out of the park so strongly. Benefit of drawing people into their ecosystem. It's the benefit of how Apple does product ownership. In contrast to Google and Microsoft. I hadn't considered it, but AI convergence is going to lay bare organizational deficiencies in a way previous revolutions didn't. Nobody…

Why wouldn't Microsoft be able to? Anyway, while I see all of your points, none of the things I've read in the news make me excited. Recapping meetings or long emails or suggesting how to write are just...not major concerns to me at least.

> Why wouldn't Microsoft be able to?

they are irrelevant on the mobile ecosystem, a place where almost all this features are most relevant and useful

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I like their approach. Do everything possible on device and if it can only be done off-device, provide that choice.

You misunderstand. They will go off device without asking you, they just ask if you want to use ChatGPT.

No: they do on device, ask to do off device in their private cloud. Chatgpt is then a separate integration / intent you ask can for

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#414
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why take up processor time or memory for a feature I don't want? Or the increase in threat space?

This could be said for literally every single feature of a smartphone, down to the out of order execution of the CPU

I also have animations toned down from the accessibility settings, yes :)

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#415
> Apple Intelligence is free for users, and will be available in beta as part of iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia this fall in U.S. English. Some features, software platforms, and additional languages will come over the course of the next year. Apple Intelligence will be available on iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro Max, and iPad and Mac with M1 and later, with Siri and device language set to U.S. English. For more information, visit apple.com/apple-intelligence.

iphone 15 Pro 8 GB RAM (https://www.gsmarena.com/apple_iphone_15_pro-12557.php)

iphone 15 6 GB Ram (https://www.gsmarena.com/apple_iphone_15-12559.php)

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#416
post #339
post #278

I am deeply disturbed they decided to go off-device for these services to work. This is a terrible precedent, seemingly inconsistent with their previous philosophies and likely a pressured decision. I don't care if they put the word "private" in there or have an endless amount of "expert" audits. What a shame.

They didn't have a choice. Doing everything on-device would result in a horrible user experience. They might as well not participate in this generative AI rush at all if they hoped to keep it on-device. Which would have looked even worse for them. Their brand is equally about creativity as it is about privacy. They wouldn't chop off one arm to keep the other, but that's what you're suggesting they should have done. A…

> Doing everything on-device would result in a horrible user experience. They might as well not participate in this generative AI rush at all if they hoped to keep it on-device.

On the contrary, I'm shocked over the last few months how "on device" on a Macbook Pro or Mac Studio competes plausibly with last year's early GPT-4, leveraging Llama 3 70b or Qwen2 72b.

There are surprisingly few things you "need" 128GB of so-called "unified RAM" for, but with M-series processors and the memory bandwidth, this is a use case that shines.

From this thread covering performance of llama.cpp on Apple Silicon M-series …

https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/discussions/4167

"Buy as much memory as you can afford would be my bottom line!"

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#417
For anyone who is technical and wants to play with AI but doesn’t want to use cloud services it’s worth digging into LangChain, CrewAI, OpenDevin. Coupled with Ollama to serve the inference from your local network. You can scratch the AI itch without getting in bed with OpenAI.

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#418

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? Things are secure (outside of the explicit OpenAI calls via Siri) and mostly seem subtly integrated. You don't have to use each feature, but why blindly disable all AI having not even tried it?

Not wanting to send that much data to Apple's server no matter the pinky promise they make about caring for our data? That's a legit ask.

Apple's? You mean OpenAI's...

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

if I can't turn 100% of this botshit off then my iphone's going in the bin I'll go back to a dumbphone before I feed the AI

You’re not feeding anything by having this feature turned on

I have zero confidence in any privacy or contractual guarantees being respected by the parasitic OpenAI

Re: Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac

#420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> AKA there would be a way to choose backends. I think the percentage of iPhone users for who this would matter is very small. It's similar to how many people care about using a different browser than Safari on iOS (or Chrome on Google): in the US at least, those two browsers have ~95% market share.

> I think the percentage of iPhone users for who this would matter is very small. Oh yeah? Then why don't they permit you to choose an App Store, a browser, a messenger, a blah blah blah...

You can set the default browser.

And there are plenty of messaging apps on iOS.

App store, sure, they don't allow sideloading, but that's a different matter (and the number of users, not devs, who care about that is even smaller)

Post reply on HN