One thing that has helped me over the last two years is not watching or reading the news (I've haven't done social media in a decade). I know some people will think it is morally wrong of me to not be interested in the world and society. In fact, I used to think as much too, and thought myself terribly clever because I had an Economist subscription. The fact is that I _am_ interested in the world and society, but all…
If it helps you that’s good and I might do the same. But two things: a) this is a luxury you can afford because you live in a country where you can trust that your house isn’t going to explode tomorrow. b) If everybody did this, a) would quickly no longer be true…
Maybe the spiral goes in the other direction: Because no one does, a) is not true. I.e. because many people are "keeping up with hour-by-hour events", your house may explode tomorrow. If everyone was living under a rock, your house would be safe.
Maybe there are two equilibriums. One equilibrium where everyone needs to know about current events because their houses may explode, and another equilibrium where everyone lives under a rock because their houses are save.