Live data from Hacker News

Roman Roads (2017)

sashamaps.net

41–50 of 166 posts

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#41

That's really well done! I have no comment on the accuracy but it really highlights just how the Romans integrated new areas into the central empire through transportation (goods, ideas, and armies). I will also call out the road in Africa called "Caeserea lol"

The ego! It should have been called Via Scipio Africanus Motherforker

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#42

Sometimes I wonder if we've regressed in terms of attention to quality. Here in the US, I see lots of potholes on the streets and sidewalks. Meanwhile, the ancient cobblestone roads are still functional to this day.

Bad roads are safer. We design our roads to be driven much faster than anyone should. Potholes and rough areas slow us down

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#43
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Horses would often be swapped out at stations when a wealthy person would have to travel very quickly across a long distance. Maybe this is an average since the speed with which horsemen could travel would depend on the rate at which they exchanged their horses. In an extreme example from the year 9 BC, the future emperor Tiberius traveled on the Roman Roads 330 miles (531 km) between northern Italy and modern day Ma…

So he rode really fast, reckless and sleep deprived to his brother who’d been injured in a horse riding accident?

People never change.

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#44

Sometimes I wonder if we've regressed in terms of attention to quality. Here in the US, I see lots of potholes on the streets and sidewalks. Meanwhile, the ancient cobblestone roads are still functional to this day.

Bad roads are safer. We design our roads to be driven much faster than anyone should. Potholes and rough areas slow us down

There are a few studies, with arguable relevancy that discovered that roads that are safe but look dangerous are safer than merely safe roads.

None of that has any relation at all with potholes. Potholes are dangerous and may not be even noticeable at a distance.

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#45

There's a missing road in Sardinia that I'm aware of, connecting Karalis (today's Cagliari) with Turris Libisonis (today's Porto Torres, near Sassari).

This is mentioned in the „Creative liberties taken“ section. It’s not a complete map.

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#46
Very schematic from region I live around - Geneva and Aosta are not that far on the map and seem close neighbours, but highest part of alps lies in between, passes can be brutal and far apart (>=2500m high, ie St Bernard pass from where famous dogs come from, can end up snowed anytime all year round and especially 2000 years ago, at least 6 months/year unpassable for carriages and dangerous for anything else).

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#47
Pretty cool.

My parents grew up in small villages that are adjacent to one of these ancient roads (via Tiburtina: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Tiburtina) and the road basically still exists as a modern road.

I remember driving near Pescara with my parents in the 1990s--they had not been back to Italy in 35+ years and they were trying to find their way back to their home towns.

We stopped the car on the side of a main road and asked a woman who was walking, "Dov'e' la Tiburtina?" (where is the Tiburtina?).

The woman responded... "QUEST'E' la Tiburtina!" (This is the Tiburtina).

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#48

Sometimes I wonder if we've regressed in terms of attention to quality. Here in the US, I see lots of potholes on the streets and sidewalks. Meanwhile, the ancient cobblestone roads are still functional to this day.

Cars are the problem.

And just FYI roman roads were maintained. We dont have documentation on this from the early imperial period. But from the Byzantine period we know that there were local people responsible for maintenance.

And we also know that even during Byzantine times many roads were reverting to nature. Road maintence was a real problem.

Re: Roman Roads (2017)

#50
The Roman Empire was very advanced for the time, and it left such a huge imprint on the civilization even centuries, and thousands of years after it.

The organization was a different scale.

Fun fact: Some of the most famous battles in England in the middle ages, such as battle of Hasting, were basically 5k - 9k soldiers in each side. That's just one and a half Roman legion.

Rome, could field 12 legions at a time, and the scale was insane. I can see why the Roman Empire remained such a symbol of civilization for a thousand of years after its fall.

Post reply on HN