Live data from Hacker News

Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

haaretz.com

281–290 of 807 posts

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#281
post #209

This was related to OpenAI announcing that they had shut down several covert influence campaigns using ChatGPT-generated social media posts. https://openai.com/index/disrupting-deceptive-uses-of-AI-by-...

This article itself seems to be written by chatgpt to some degree at least? I've developed trust-issues with bullet point lists in that format.

If anything, OpenAI's affection for bullet lists is probably a window into why ChatGPT uses them so frequently.

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#282
post #70

Well their enemies used social accounts to garner support from US citizens so you've got to start somewhere! It's not like we haven't done this either. I worked for a company in 2005 which was doing this paid for by politicians. Moment I worked this out, I quit.

[flagged]

An exercise with war casualty stats you can do is look at previous wars and look at the variation in estimates in body counts for each side. Then factor that into the news you are reading it.

End game is there has never been a credible body count from even a small scale war. So to claim anyone is right here on either side is probably selective bias on your part. At best when the dust has figuratively and literally settled, it'll be a decade before anyone has an even remotely credible count.

Manipulation of the body counts is easy material for propaganda. It has been since the dawn of war.

Factor child soldiers into these arguments and it gets very grey. The number itself without compounding facts has little meaning.

And for the sake of credibility, the figures were later revised so you're not even quoting their current estimates and compromising your own credibility!

https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/...

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The holocaust came of age in the dawn of the information age if you count the radio as information technology, albeit a very one-sided information technology where you had the government giving everyone cheap radios that were only marked to tune to German and Austrian radio stations, unless you dared to go out at night to get an antenna up to receive others. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksempf%C3%A4nger

[deleted]

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its not at all, even if you mean “social media age”, and not “information age”, it's just one of the first (there are other disputed candidates, e.g., in Ukraine) that are getting first world attention other than after-the-fact. The Rohingya genocide in Myanmar in which Facebook’s role was widely discussed (largely, in the first world, after the fact) was probably the first social media age genocide, if you don't res…

I’m thinking in terms of processes and propaganda. While other genocides use information technology for communication and propaganda, this one is unique in that information technology is used throughout, including in target selection and killings. The Rohingya Genocide does not e.g. use drones to carry out killings with targets selected by AI.

> While other genocides use information technology for communication and propaganda, this one is unique in that information technology is used throughout, including in target selection and killings.

No, its not. Heck, the Holocaust used information technology for target selection.

> The Rohingya Genocide does not e.g. use drones

The genocides in the former Yugoslavia used most of the weapons of then-modern warfare, which may not have included drones but certainly involved plenty of weapons systems that incorporate "information technology" in doing the killings.

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The holocaust came of age in the dawn of the information age if you count the radio as information technology, albeit a very one-sided information technology where you had the government giving everyone cheap radios that were only marked to tune to German and Austrian radio stations, unless you dared to go out at night to get an antenna up to receive others. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksempf%C3%A4nger

This also applies to the Rwandan genocide. A lot of it was perpetrated via mass media, especially radio. But you can also claim that there were Industrialized genocides before the Holocaust, but what sets it apart is just how much it was defined by industrialized processes. The Gaza Genocide is similar, the use of AI for target selection (or rather generation), the social media campaigns, using drones for killings, e…

Germany pioneered a lot of modern propaganda techniques in WWII:

The first television broadcast on earth was of Hitler, and his chief propagandist, Goebbles, continues to have significant influence on modern propagandists. For instance, Biden's publicly compared the tactics Trump used in the 2020 "Big Lie" campaign to those of Goebbles. Of course, there was also the Hitler Youth, which was a pretty successful social engineering campaign.

On the computer side of things: IBM mainframes were famously an enabling technology for the holocaust and german war machine.

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#286
post #143

I find it quite concerning just how much propaganda the US seems to get from Israel. Where I live there are big billboards around, I regularly see ads on YouTube. I know propaganda is a thing, but it feels like we are getting more about a foreign government than our own. I feel like before what is going on now I was aware of some of the groups responsible for this being a thing, but was not fully aware just how much…

> I don't understand how this much power over the US was ever deemed acceptable? Free speech sometimes applies to things you don’t like. There’s pro and anti propaganda for just about any foreign interest. Some of it’s just more subtle such as recommendations on TikTok. Ukraine had really obvious pro Ukraine requests for military aid and images of destruction, but quite a bit of pro Russia propaganda was more subtle…

Like the kind of free speech you get when Israel's lobby drafts and helps pass laws that making boycotts of Israel illegal?

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#287
post #275
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Manufacturing Consent" was written in the 80s mostly in response to newspapers, but the ideas have been adapted to the Internet for some time (and talk radio, and cable news, etc.). I'm old enough to remember this from the Iraq war. Yeah, we didn't have microblogging back then, but there were Email campaigns, blogs, message boards, chat rooms, etc.

And let's keep in mind that the term "Public Relations" was explicitly chosen as a Newspeak-term because Edward Bernays realised that the actual term for a war time methodology, "propaganda", was too loaded.[0] And honest. Internet is a communications medium. It was destined to be flooded with propaganda, whatever you try to call your particular flavour. Or as I have been saying since the 1990's, the only difference…

> Or as I have been saying since the 1990's, the only difference between marketing and propaganda is that with marketing at least you are trying to peddle a product instead of an ideology.

I disagree, ideologies are often already in there, even when they are simplistic "power-tools are for men and all men require power-tools", or "having better stuff than your neighbors is a virtue, failing to do so will lead to dangerous ostracization."

Very tame "Our blender spins twice as fast as the competition" marketing might be arguably free of ideology, but that's a decreasing minority.

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#288

The wild part about this, at least to me, is the wholesale incompetence demonstrated by Israel in this regard. If I couldn't google the talking points the bots make and see Israeli officials saying the same things, one would think these bots were Iranians acting with the intent to make Israel look bad.

Even the spooky spy and torture people choose the crappy low bidding implementation partner

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#289

Not a comment about who's right or wrong in this war, but it is fascinating that we have entered the age of the Internet being a place where warfare is fought. There have always been people posting web content about conflicts but now with Gaza and Ukraine, it seems that the nations fighting are actively looking at the internet as the fourth field of battle. Just waiting for a random US future president to create an "…

US already has https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Cyber_Command

Re: Israel reportedly used fake social accounts to garner support from US lawmakers

#290
post #275
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Manufacturing Consent" was written in the 80s mostly in response to newspapers, but the ideas have been adapted to the Internet for some time (and talk radio, and cable news, etc.). I'm old enough to remember this from the Iraq war. Yeah, we didn't have microblogging back then, but there were Email campaigns, blogs, message boards, chat rooms, etc.

And let's keep in mind that the term "Public Relations" was explicitly chosen as a Newspeak-term because Edward Bernays realised that the actual term for a war time methodology, "propaganda", was too loaded.[0] And honest. Internet is a communications medium. It was destined to be flooded with propaganda, whatever you try to call your particular flavour. Or as I have been saying since the 1990's, the only difference…

> "propaganda", was too loaded.[0] And honest.

Quite often I default to the word propaganda when talking about anyone's PR campaigns in my own personal battle with trying to undo this. I ratchet it up when talking directly to marketing/PR people. Pretty much every time I'm just looked at as yet another crazy person.

Post reply on HN