Won't break up Google, telecoms, banks ,agriciltural behemoths, and a myriad of other monster corporates that control prices.
Color me not surprised.
281–290 of 319 posts
Won't break up Google, telecoms, banks ,agriciltural behemoths, and a myriad of other monster corporates that control prices.
Color me not surprised.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No one is forced to go see a concert. Somehow millions of people survive without doing it.
Agree. Somehow environmentalist have not picked on this. I imagine popular concerts would have huge carbon footprint.
Next up, replies with reasons why drinking bottled water is ok for environmentalists.
The FTC and DoJ have been hitting it out of the park recently, unfortunately, there are a lot of judges out there that think corps should be able to do anything they want.
I want to see them go after the credit card companies. They can start by passing usury laws that cap interest at 10%.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cynicism helps people feel smart, when in many cases it actually just reveals their immense ignorance (such as this case).
Or, they've lived on enough to see the impact of regulation go wrong.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Giving up on your democratic representation is not going to make things better.
What democratic representation? > “The preferences of the average American appear to have only a miniscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”
The primary thing that causes drift from fairness is lack of voter turnout.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This defeatist attitude is unhelpful. Are you prepared to lose nearly everything come November? What will you do when the dictatorship looms over you, will you accept your dwindling freedoms? What would cause you to actually stand up for yourself and fight for a better future? I see this attitude espoused a lot and I wonder if any of the people who say so will just roll over and accept a creeping totalitarianism with…
Dictators can actually get something done for you, I'd prefer that to our current anarcho-tyranny. "Francis's term "anarcho-tyranny" refers to armed dictatorship without rule of law, or a Hegelian synthesis when the state tyrannically or oppressively regulates citizens' lives yet is unable or unwilling to enforce fundamental protective law."
> Dictators can actually get something done for you, I'd prefer that to our current [x]
the historical track record of that sentiment is both plenty long and plenty awful. Are you ignorant of that history or dispute it or think it’ll be different this time or what?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This defeatist attitude is unhelpful. Are you prepared to lose nearly everything come November? What will you do when the dictatorship looms over you, will you accept your dwindling freedoms? What would cause you to actually stand up for yourself and fight for a better future? I see this attitude espoused a lot and I wonder if any of the people who say so will just roll over and accept a creeping totalitarianism with…
Dictators can actually get something done for you, I'd prefer that to our current anarcho-tyranny. "Francis's term "anarcho-tyranny" refers to armed dictatorship without rule of law, or a Hegelian synthesis when the state tyrannically or oppressively regulates citizens' lives yet is unable or unwilling to enforce fundamental protective law."
PLEASE make this happen Uncle Sam! i am a lover of music, my friends are lovers of music, the circles i run in on the internet are lovers of music. i cannot express in words how much Live Nation sucks. they are ruining concerts. not only do they have a strangle-hold on venues, but why the hell are they "allowed" to run some in-house scalping ops? i cannot wait for the day i see their demise. i will not pour out a bee…
> but why the hell are they "allowed" to run some in-house scalping ops? Because the promoters, talent, and talent management are all in on it, TM just agrees to take the heat for its cut. That is not to say that separating TM from the venues will not help concert goers, but maybe not as much as you might think.
I was a fly on the wall for a conversation with someone who runs a 12k seat venue. They guaranteed Harry Styles $5 million for 2 nights and made it work because.... "secondary". Even the venues are in on the scalping.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Going after ticket master makes no sense and would accomplish nothing. Artist set the price of their tickets, ticketmaster is a middleman/scapegoat. Seems it whole scheme worked perfectly if most think they're to blame.
Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s monopoly and colluding practices are what’s enabling them. Going after them definitely accomplishes a whole lot. Additionally, if artists were to continue the high prices in a more transparent manner without them, then that’s fine - it’s a free country and a free market.
This is exactly why this board is a waste of time. Half of what you read on here are people talking about things they have no idea about and/or no vested interest in the outcome.
Just a large collection of wankers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or, they've lived on enough to see the impact of regulation go wrong.
Like good design, good regulation becomes invisible. Actual wisdom is recognizing and counteracting that bias.