Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?
11–20 of 25 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?
#12I find it better overall, it's my default. It's also what people think in blind tests: https://arena.lmsys.org
They should really be streaming the content at the same time, based on the slowest responder.
Re: Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?
#13Their claim hasn't been that 4o is better than 4. Just that it's faster and cheaper. So it's better than 3.5-turbo but not as good as 4, atleast from the examples I've tried out for summarization, code gen etc.
Re: Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?
#14I find it better overall, it's my default. It's also what people think in blind tests: https://arena.lmsys.org
Take those results with a large grain of salt. It's dead simple to figure out which response is the new model purely by the speed at which the result is returned, and as such, this is incredibly easy to bot in an effort to manipulate the rankings. They should really be streaming the content at the same time, based on the slowest responder.
Re: Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?
#15I was using Claude Opus to code before and now I'm back to ChatGPT. GPT-4o is faster, doesn't generate placeholders and works way better for me because of the larger context.