Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 25 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?

#12

I find it better overall, it's my default. It's also what people think in blind tests: https://arena.lmsys.org

Take those results with a large grain of salt. It's dead simple to figure out which response is the new model purely by the speed at which the result is returned, and as such, this is incredibly easy to bot in an effort to manipulate the rankings.

They should really be streaming the content at the same time, based on the slowest responder.

Re: Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?

#13
post #3

Their claim hasn't been that 4o is better than 4. Just that it's faster and cheaper. So it's better than 3.5-turbo but not as good as 4, atleast from the examples I've tried out for summarization, code gen etc.

Why would they give free access to GPT4 when it's more expensive than 4o?

Re: Ask HN: Is GPT-4o overall worse than GPT-4 for you?

#14
post #12

I find it better overall, it's my default. It's also what people think in blind tests: https://arena.lmsys.org

Take those results with a large grain of salt. It's dead simple to figure out which response is the new model purely by the speed at which the result is returned, and as such, this is incredibly easy to bot in an effort to manipulate the rankings. They should really be streaming the content at the same time, based on the slowest responder.

Who would manipulate the rankings to make OpenAI look better? Are you sure you can tell the difference between a small llama3 8b or a fast gemini?
Post reply on HN