Earlier quoted context omitted.
A recent PG essay[0] was revealing about why colleges are so prominent on those profiles and more generally about YC's thinking: > At this point I'm going to tell you something you might not want to hear. It really matters to do well in your classes, even the ones that are just memorization or blathering about literature, because you need to do well in your classes to get into a good university. And if you want to st…
I have to partly disagree with him there. My schools included MIT and Brown. And I generally really liked the students at both. And I would hire many of them. But I've also hung out in other circles that attract smart people, where I'd selectively hire first, before prioritizing random people from the fancy-pants schools. And I've worked too many places where some of the smartest and most accomplished people came fro…
> If you want "How to Start Google [where everyone focuses on the entrance exam, and then on gaming their promotions]" then you absolutely should hire Stanford students, who had to exercise very similar thinking to get into Stanford at this point.
I realize that this applies to Google post-2015, but do you think it also applies to early Google? Where you actually had to get things done?