Earlier quoted context omitted.
> common signal in both (i.e. the sound coming out of the speakers) is nulled out, but the difference signal (the voice) makes it through. What drives this? Singers and speakers are both localized sources, so I'd expect the mics to pick up similar phases for each. I bet it's distance! Falloff depends on distance to source, so there should be a larger difference in volume for closer sources.
Yeah one microphone was behind the other, though I was under the impression it was half a wavelength behind and thus created something quite akin to modern active noise-cancellation? Edit: Apparently this is not the case!
The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
11–20 of 130 posts
Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#12I remember chatting with a sound technician at a concert once and he told me that putting amplification in front of the performers only started happening in the late 60's (ish). Before that musicians were actually subjected to insane DB's by standing only a few meters in front of the amplification. (Don't take this is as fact, but this diagram suggests that he was correct)
Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#13The core of it is that speakers are bad at polyphony, so if you can avoid it, you can produce something that sounds more natural to human ears, and do so in a larger area. The way to avoid it is more speakers, more stacks/arrays/etc. You don't necessarily need an array per instrument, because modern loudspeaker arrays are indeed much better than they used to be, and modern loudspeaker processing fixes a multitude of problems.
Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#14Article doesn't mention one of the more interesting (to me) aspects which was how feedback was avoided. The solution is elegant: each vocal microphone is doubled, meaning there are two at each position. The phase is inverted on one of them, the singer sings into only one, and both are sent to the speakers via their channel's amp. The effect of that setup is that only the difference between the two microphones is ampl…
Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#15Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
> common signal in both (i.e. the sound coming out of the speakers) is nulled out, but the difference signal (the voice) makes it through. What drives this? Singers and speakers are both localized sources, so I'd expect the mics to pick up similar phases for each. I bet it's distance! Falloff depends on distance to source, so there should be a larger difference in volume for closer sources.
Yeah one microphone was behind the other, though I was under the impression it was half a wavelength behind and thus created something quite akin to modern active noise-cancellation? Edit: Apparently this is not the case!
Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
> common signal in both (i.e. the sound coming out of the speakers) is nulled out, but the difference signal (the voice) makes it through. What drives this? Singers and speakers are both localized sources, so I'd expect the mics to pick up similar phases for each. I bet it's distance! Falloff depends on distance to source, so there should be a larger difference in volume for closer sources.
Yeah one microphone was behind the other, though I was under the impression it was half a wavelength behind and thus created something quite akin to modern active noise-cancellation? Edit: Apparently this is not the case!
Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#18Th' Dead not only allowed taping, they encouraged it: at the shows I attended, there was invariably a small grove of microphones set up near the soundboard, in the middle of the audience. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taper_(concert) (a disadvantage to too much ethology reading: I can't remember "Bill Graham Presents" without thinking of baboon behaviour)
I'd love to hear more about your experience and observations of taping at the shows. Not only did GD (and particularly Jerry Garcia and John Perry Barlow) eschew the 'intellectual property' model of music, their thought-leadership has lived on to become much of what we today consider fundamental internet technology and methodology. Early decentralized crypto-economics, peer-to-peer file sharing, and the founding of t…
Owsley (wall of sound engineer) was one of the original major LSD manufactures... and a dead show was always where you went to score ACID if you lived on the east coast. This remained true well into the 90's.
I'm going to guess that all of those early internet pioneers that you mentioned also have fond stories of LSD.
The Dead, Bill graham, hells angles, peoples temple, Patty Hearst.... There is a continuum of culture that spills out of San Francisco to this very day.
Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#19Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
#20Dave Rat, of Rat Sound/RHCP/Bassnectar/etc fame, has some very interesting takes on the wall of sound idea using modern equipment. The core of it is that speakers are bad at polyphony, so if you can avoid it, you can produce something that sounds more natural to human ears, and do so in a larger area. The way to avoid it is more speakers, more stacks/arrays/etc. You don't necessarily need an array per instrument, bec…