Live data from Hacker News

The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

audioacademy.in

11–20 of 130 posts

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> common signal in both (i.e. the sound coming out of the speakers) is nulled out, but the difference signal (the voice) makes it through. What drives this? Singers and speakers are both localized sources, so I'd expect the mics to pick up similar phases for each. I bet it's distance! Falloff depends on distance to source, so there should be a larger difference in volume for closer sources.

Yeah one microphone was behind the other, though I was under the impression it was half a wavelength behind and thus created something quite akin to modern active noise-cancellation? Edit: Apparently this is not the case!

A very literal phased array!

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#12

I remember chatting with a sound technician at a concert once and he told me that putting amplification in front of the performers only started happening in the late 60's (ish). Before that musicians were actually subjected to insane DB's by standing only a few meters in front of the amplification. (Don't take this is as fact, but this diagram suggests that he was correct)

Must’ve felt pretty amazing, at least for a little while til the injuries started.

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#13
Dave Rat, of Rat Sound/RHCP/Bassnectar/etc fame, has some very interesting takes on the wall of sound idea using modern equipment.

The core of it is that speakers are bad at polyphony, so if you can avoid it, you can produce something that sounds more natural to human ears, and do so in a larger area. The way to avoid it is more speakers, more stacks/arrays/etc. You don't necessarily need an array per instrument, because modern loudspeaker arrays are indeed much better than they used to be, and modern loudspeaker processing fixes a multitude of problems.

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#14
post #4

Article doesn't mention one of the more interesting (to me) aspects which was how feedback was avoided. The solution is elegant: each vocal microphone is doubled, meaning there are two at each position. The phase is inverted on one of them, the singer sings into only one, and both are sent to the speakers via their channel's amp. The effect of that setup is that only the difference between the two microphones is ampl…

Since balanced cables predate the GD, this strikes me as an acoustic implementation of an EE concept. Neat!

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> common signal in both (i.e. the sound coming out of the speakers) is nulled out, but the difference signal (the voice) makes it through. What drives this? Singers and speakers are both localized sources, so I'd expect the mics to pick up similar phases for each. I bet it's distance! Falloff depends on distance to source, so there should be a larger difference in volume for closer sources.

Yeah one microphone was behind the other, though I was under the impression it was half a wavelength behind and thus created something quite akin to modern active noise-cancellation? Edit: Apparently this is not the case!

When I saw them (back in 83, it's been a long strange trip) it looked more like one mic was on top of the other with about a 6 inch separation.

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> common signal in both (i.e. the sound coming out of the speakers) is nulled out, but the difference signal (the voice) makes it through. What drives this? Singers and speakers are both localized sources, so I'd expect the mics to pick up similar phases for each. I bet it's distance! Falloff depends on distance to source, so there should be a larger difference in volume for closer sources.

Yeah one microphone was behind the other, though I was under the impression it was half a wavelength behind and thus created something quite akin to modern active noise-cancellation? Edit: Apparently this is not the case!

See https://archive.org/post/256492/the-betty-question-answered for more details both on WoS and the microphone setup.

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#18
post #5

Th' Dead not only allowed taping, they encouraged it: at the shows I attended, there was invariably a small grove of microphones set up near the soundboard, in the middle of the audience. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taper_(concert) (a disadvantage to too much ethology reading: I can't remember "Bill Graham Presents" without thinking of baboon behaviour)

I'd love to hear more about your experience and observations of taping at the shows. Not only did GD (and particularly Jerry Garcia and John Perry Barlow) eschew the 'intellectual property' model of music, their thought-leadership has lived on to become much of what we today consider fundamental internet technology and methodology. Early decentralized crypto-economics, peer-to-peer file sharing, and the founding of t…

It's almost impossible to talk about The Dead and not talk about LSD.

Owsley (wall of sound engineer) was one of the original major LSD manufactures... and a dead show was always where you went to score ACID if you lived on the east coast. This remained true well into the 90's.

I'm going to guess that all of those early internet pioneers that you mentioned also have fond stories of LSD.

The Dead, Bill graham, hells angles, peoples temple, Patty Hearst.... There is a continuum of culture that spills out of San Francisco to this very day.

Re: The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)

#20

Dave Rat, of Rat Sound/RHCP/Bassnectar/etc fame, has some very interesting takes on the wall of sound idea using modern equipment. The core of it is that speakers are bad at polyphony, so if you can avoid it, you can produce something that sounds more natural to human ears, and do so in a larger area. The way to avoid it is more speakers, more stacks/arrays/etc. You don't necessarily need an array per instrument, bec…

Another advantage of individual speakers for each instrument is that it allows positioning them without the phase cancellation artifacts you get with a stereo setup. It's obvious with some sounds, e.g. try playing some mono pink noise on stereo speakers and move your head. Then try again after hard panning the audio to only one of the speakers. This is why adding a real physical center channel makes dialogue clearer in movies.
Post reply on HN