Live data from Hacker News

Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

phys.org

111–120 of 172 posts

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#111
post #36

I'd like to see a weight tax on vehicles. Lighter vehicles have less tire wear, so less pollution. They also require less energy to move, so less emissions. Plus lighter vehicles would improve pedestrian safety.

> Lighter vehicles have less tire wear, so less pollution.

there are different tire rubber/synthetic formulations, as another independent (of weight) variable

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#112
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> wealthy folks choosing to live in low density areas There's no way you're saying this with a straight face, right? People move out of the city because it's significantly cheaper. Rent in a nice two bedroom "downtown" is $3500. You move 15 minutes out of there and you can get 3 bedroom house for an $1800 mortgage that'll never go up. Source: I did that. I got tired of paying such a huge chunk of my income for living…

It’s cheaper because not enough city housing is built and there are other costs associated with suburban living. IMO, property taxes should increase as density decreases because those less dense areas will cost a lot more to maintain roads, utilities, etc. down the road.

Higher property taxes for less dense areas might make sense for suburbs of big cities, but not beyond that. In the countryside road and other infrastructure is required for agriculture, if some people also choose to live there (and that way reduce prices in cities) it's a win-win.

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#113
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Driving is an amazing. It allows everyone huge amounts of freedom in what they do and who they spend time with. Having lots of shops and workplaces near your home is great and should be encouraged, but we should try and find ways to keep the freedom of personal transportation and reduce the impact it has. Lots and lots of tunnels, better tires, electric cars use brakes much less and could get to almost zero, etc.

Cars are our worst invention, second only to agriculture.

did you forget gunpowder and religion?

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#114
post #36

I'd like to see a weight tax on vehicles. Lighter vehicles have less tire wear, so less pollution. They also require less energy to move, so less emissions. Plus lighter vehicles would improve pedestrian safety.

That would amount to a tax on (among other vehicles) electric vehicles, which weight a lot more than comparable ICE cars.

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#115
post #36

I'd like to see a weight tax on vehicles. Lighter vehicles have less tire wear, so less pollution. They also require less energy to move, so less emissions. Plus lighter vehicles would improve pedestrian safety.

I'm tired of viewing taxes as a punishment. Taxes are for funding the government. If you're going to tax someone make sure the money goes to something specific, like keeping tire junk out of waterways.

Some people like to drive, some people like big cars. Fix the tires, grand-daddy in all the existing cars, incentivize cleaner ones, and let everything age out.

They're doing it with heat pumps, why not cars?

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#116
post #72

My neighbor on one side maintains their virginal lawn with copious amounts of roundup, the neighbor on the other has a facsimile in astroturf. We will wallow, willingly, in trash, breathing fumes, particle dust, just because of an imitative, aesthetic fad. It's absolutely incredible to me.

If you don't mind my asking, how do you maintain your property? It may be illustrative to see what some of the alternatives to the scenarios you described with your neighbors might be.

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#117
post #36

I'd like to see a weight tax on vehicles. Lighter vehicles have less tire wear, so less pollution. They also require less energy to move, so less emissions. Plus lighter vehicles would improve pedestrian safety.

I'm tired of viewing taxes as a punishment. Taxes are for funding the government. If you're going to tax someone make sure the money goes to something specific, like keeping tire junk out of waterways. Some people like to drive, some people like big cars. Fix the tires, grand-daddy in all the existing cars, incentivize cleaner ones, and let everything age out. They're doing it with heat pumps, why not cars?

It's not about punishment, its about pricing in externalities

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#119
post #72

My neighbor on one side maintains their virginal lawn with copious amounts of roundup, the neighbor on the other has a facsimile in astroturf. We will wallow, willingly, in trash, breathing fumes, particle dust, just because of an imitative, aesthetic fad. It's absolutely incredible to me.

If you don't mind my asking, how do you maintain your property? It may be illustrative to see what some of the alternatives to the scenarios you described with your neighbors might be.

I mow and weed wack. Looks tidy, but lawn is mix of weeds and grass.

Re: Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs

#120
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’d almost guarantee the bristles on a street sweeper are also leaching insane amounts of toxic crap into the environment. I bet they’re plastic…

They are metal, you find them in the road sometimes.

You can make an alright set of lock picks out of them.
Post reply on HN