I like the Walled Garden. I want the Walled Garden. Almost everyone wants the Walled Garden. Even Android users should want the Walled Garden, as a true second option. The Walled garden is fantastic. When everything just works, it's fantastic.
Apple's product quality is without consumer equal. The quality a bright-light in a world otherwise brimming with hardware junk and a software wild west market.
The antitrust issues are obviously without basis. This is an institutional effort to degrade the product line, and the lawsuits and regulations smell of hidden agenda.
As a longtime Windows user, Windows is a privacy and security clown show. Linux is a server OS that is unusable for most casual desktop OS consumers. We're decades into the information age, and embarassingly there are only two usable desktop operating system ecosystems for the common person (Why is that, exactly?) aside from ChromeOS. And only one of the ecosystems, the one being targeted, is marginally acceptable from a consumer perspective. Given privacy, security, usability, and quality factors.
A better so called "anti-monopoly" solution would be to build competitive products. Antitrust law was conceived to open up markets in the circumstance where the market was actually actively walled off by the monopolist. It wasn't conceived, for example, to stop car manufacturers from engineering the cars to accept parts that are only made for their cars. The last time that I checked, Apple was not preventing competitive product development. Android has a massive user base. This State effort to abuse the law so that things are worse quality has to stop.