Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a brand new Lenovo laptop. Is that "bad hardware"?
With Lenovo it could be either. Thinkpads have historically worked pretty well with Linux. The more consumer oriented stuff can be hit or miss. Generally the more newfangled features (dual screens, detachability, extra eink displays, etc.), the worse the support. Thinkpads also tend to last longer, so there’s more time for driver support to catch up before they’re broken or obsolete.
Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
91–100 of 115 posts
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So if you’re not invested in Linux ideologically, it’s difficult to recommend, for laptops in particular. Linux has practical benefits as well; it's not just ideology. But yes, if you want Linux you should make sure your hardware supports it.
Put another way, add "poor hardware support" to the list of reasons not to use Linux.
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#93Will I finally be able to use a bluetooth headset's high quality audio output and its mic at the same time without significant changes in the terminal? It's getting embarrassing that every other mobile and desktop OS has no problem doing this but not Ubuntu.
The "solution" other vendors take is to maintain the high quality bluetooth audio output to your headphones while using your laptop's microphone as input. They basically don't use your headset's mic in order to keep your headset in A2DP mode for high quality audio. You can also easily configure this in PulseAudio Volume Control. You can't work around the fundamental limitations of Bluetooth protocols like A2DP withou…
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#94Ah good times. I started out with one of the early ones, maybe 4.04 or something like that. Ubuntu was my first Linux, and then Mint. Unfortunately, for work purposes, I had to switch to MacOS (not a bad OS), but I still miss Linux from time to time, especially reading about that story on the frontpage about people losing access to their Apple IDs. I think I'll give it another shot soon...
It was one of the first pieces of mail that I received personally and it felt like Christmas.
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it's not read-only. It's just that the writes are somewhat random, and in control of God and physics, rather than, of human design. (speaking as someone with a big pile of CD-Rs in the attic, most of which have some forms of corruption on them) I'd love to see a standard like M-Disc in mainstream use. The problem is optical has not kept up with magnetic. M-Disc is about $100 for 100GB. In contrast, I bought a 20T…
Optical made advancements beyond the DVD. However they caught on only in a limited manner. There is Blue-Ray, now 128GB 4-layer. However, due to the amount of data we generate and consume, long term storage is less of a concern at the consumer level, i.e. there is almost always more where that came from. Content has, simply put, been commoditized.
In 1982, a 20MB HDD was considered large, while a CD is 640MB. That's an almost insurmountable 20x advantage to optical.
By the late nineties, a DVD was 4.7GB, while typical HDDs were maybe 500MB-2GB, giving a more modest advantage to optical.
In 2024, a HDD is maybe 200 times bigger than optical (20TB versus 100GB), while an SSD is maybe 10x bigger (1TB versus 100GB).
Prices are also worth looking at. 100GB media is maybe $10/disk. I remember buying CD-Rs and DVD-Rs in stacks of 20-100, at maybe 10 cents-$2 per disk, depending on type, quantity, and year. The cost-per-byte for optical media has hardly changed in two decades.
So limited progress.
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#96Interesting observation, that in 20 years installer iso size grew almost ten times: from 643M CD to current 5.7G image, that won't fit even on single layer DVD (not that someone are still using those). I was also surprised how little difference "default selection" and "extended selection" makes in disk space usage - "extended" is taking up only 1GB more of disk space.
I really wish net installers were still popular. For a while, most distros offered a tiny install image, like a few hundred MB that contained just enough to bootstrap the installer to pull the real OS data from the internet (or other network source). Sometimes I only have small USB2.0 flash drives. I can't fit a full-fat installer on there, and even if I could, my network connection is much faster anyway. Hell, insta…
Ubuntu still has netinstall available as an option, it's ~80MB.
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#97Interesting observation, that in 20 years installer iso size grew almost ten times: from 643M CD to current 5.7G image, that won't fit even on single layer DVD (not that someone are still using those). I was also surprised how little difference "default selection" and "extended selection" makes in disk space usage - "extended" is taking up only 1GB more of disk space.
Wow! Is there a breakdown of how this space is used? Arch ISO is 950MB...
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#98Interesting observation, that in 20 years installer iso size grew almost ten times: from 643M CD to current 5.7G image, that won't fit even on single layer DVD (not that someone are still using those). I was also surprised how little difference "default selection" and "extended selection" makes in disk space usage - "extended" is taking up only 1GB more of disk space.
I really wish net installers were still popular. For a while, most distros offered a tiny install image, like a few hundred MB that contained just enough to bootstrap the installer to pull the real OS data from the internet (or other network source). Sometimes I only have small USB2.0 flash drives. I can't fit a full-fat installer on there, and even if I could, my network connection is much faster anyway. Hell, insta…
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#99Does anyone know if desktop scaling on Wayland is fixed now? On 22.04 scaled desktops caused certain apps, such as Obsidian, to be blurry.
https://forum.obsidian.md/t/please-ugrade-to-the-newest-elec...
Re: Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS: Noble Numbat
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So if you’re not invested in Linux ideologically, it’s difficult to recommend, for laptops in particular. Linux has practical benefits as well; it's not just ideology. But yes, if you want Linux you should make sure your hardware supports it.
Put another way, add "poor hardware support" to the list of reasons not to use Linux.