Live data from Hacker News

Majority of web apps could just run on a single server

old.reddit.com

1–10 of 251 posts

Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server

#5
We use k8s at $JOB for literally no reason other than some engineer decided he wanted to learn k8s.

It's the worst, I don't even get to see my server logs because "that would mean giving you access to the entire thing". I'm not a k8s person but surely that has to be missing something.

We could literally make do with a cloudflare 5$ plan and have left to work with. With better integration, and better DX.

Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server

#8

We use k8s at $JOB for literally no reason other than some engineer decided he wanted to learn k8s. It's the worst, I don't even get to see my server logs because "that would mean giving you access to the entire thing". I'm not a k8s person but surely that has to be missing something. We could literally make do with a cloudflare 5$ plan and have left to work with. With better integration, and better DX.

That's not a k8s thing. It's an idealistic DevOps thing. You'd probably deal with that in alot of places.

Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server

#9
I can confirm. I've had quite a few projects that made it to the front page of HN and handled the traffic like cake. All of them ran on 5$ digital ocean droplets.

I accept some projects are more resource expensive than others, but majority of the time you can get away with a bit of asynchronous responses + scheduler/queue to spread the load horizontally over time.

Unpopular opinion: I blame the new age devops culture that made cloud app deployments unnecessarily complicated with k8s and cool new tech (that'd get them high profile jobs.) I've never come across a devops person who'd say "Hey, that sofware is too simple to prematurely scale for sudden spikes of irrational amounts of traffic, so why not just deploy it on a cheap vps?"

Post reply on HN