Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
old.reddit.com
Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
1–10 of 251 posts
Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#2Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#3Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#4Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#5It's the worst, I don't even get to see my server logs because "that would mean giving you access to the entire thing". I'm not a k8s person but surely that has to be missing something.
We could literally make do with a cloudflare 5$ plan and have left to work with. With better integration, and better DX.
Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#6Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#7Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#8We use k8s at $JOB for literally no reason other than some engineer decided he wanted to learn k8s. It's the worst, I don't even get to see my server logs because "that would mean giving you access to the entire thing". I'm not a k8s person but surely that has to be missing something. We could literally make do with a cloudflare 5$ plan and have left to work with. With better integration, and better DX.
Re: Majority of web apps could just run on a single server
#9I accept some projects are more resource expensive than others, but majority of the time you can get away with a bit of asynchronous responses + scheduler/queue to spread the load horizontally over time.
Unpopular opinion: I blame the new age devops culture that made cloud app deployments unnecessarily complicated with k8s and cool new tech (that'd get them high profile jobs.) I've never come across a devops person who'd say "Hey, that sofware is too simple to prematurely scale for sudden spikes of irrational amounts of traffic, so why not just deploy it on a cheap vps?"