IMO it would be better for the government to keep this sort of general library content on a url that doesn’t contain NIH. They have the disclaimer, > As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Anyway, it seems like an interesting collection of anecdotes that would b…
Why? The author makes it clear its purely anecdotal. Someone might come across this and decide to do a further, more scientific study. I would argue that this is valuable content that could lead to better insights on our sleep. Not having it on the NIH website would make it less likely to be viewed.