Live data from Hacker News

California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

cpuc.ca.gov

361–370 of 424 posts

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#361
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if they're allowed at SFO?

They are not. SFO, owned by the city of SF and at the behest of city officials, have been notorious in blocking Waymo: https://missionlocal.org/2023/11/waymo-rebuffed-by-sfo-sf-gu...

i've struggled to get an uber for some early morning flights and can see it being easier to waymo to millbrae bart and connect to SFO than waiting a long time or paying insane surge prices for uber

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#362
post #316
post #117

I love Waymo and use it all the time. One aspect I'd still like to see them figure out: As a bike commuter, I share the road with Waymo often. When cycling, you're always checking the eyes of other drivers to confirm if they see you. I've had a couple incidents where I was a little thrown/unnerved because I couldn't confirm if a Waymo was registering me. It ultimately behaved fine, but I had to put my guard way up be…

You can imagine some ominously humorous implementations of this. Red dot laser for pointing out people?

[dead]

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#363
post #117

I love Waymo and use it all the time. One aspect I'd still like to see them figure out: As a bike commuter, I share the road with Waymo often. When cycling, you're always checking the eyes of other drivers to confirm if they see you. I've had a couple incidents where I was a little thrown/unnerved because I couldn't confirm if a Waymo was registering me. It ultimately behaved fine, but I had to put my guard way up be…

They have tried many variations out, but so far they don't seem to think they work better than doing nothing. The only communication the Waymo's currently do it to signal that they are stopping for pedestrians, both to the pedestrians themselves and also to the cars behind. https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/13/23913251/waymo-roof-dome...

Even if the cars had a "I'm currently deciding" indicator it would be a major improvement. My only issue with these sorts of anti-socialized services is not being able to promptly and easily sue for remedy. Maybe a blood price on a few mid-level managers (or possibly higher depending on the situation) if the service ends up killing people. That would put my heart at mind in the marketplace of the future.

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s one of those experiences you didn’t realize you wanted until you have it. - No need for chit chat, you can just work / talk on the phone / play music - No 18-hour shift sweat and deodorant smell - No cursing at other drivers or awkward apologies because of fear of a bad rating - Smooth, predictable driving. I have yet to have a “holy shit” moment in a Waymo, but this happens regularly in Uber / Lyft. Also on saf…

IDK, It just sounds like some people have bad experiences and is using negativity bias to justify early tech (and ofc a skewed audience who seems to abhor socialties). All my uber rides were boring and uneventful. I see no need to pay a premium to guarantee that. Meanwhile the driving experience of autonomous drivers is still not at a satisfactory stage for me. Maybe it worked fine in SF, but LA has some pretty rough…

In my previous job I took 1000s of taxis all over Europe getting all kind of experience (including getting in an accident with a drunk taxi driver). Uber are an improvement that removed a lot of shady things but riding a Waymo in Phoenix is for me the best experience as there is almost no unknown.

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like no one in this thread lives in LA. This is going to be an absolute catastrophe. Driving out here is like Thunderdome. There is zero way in hell I'd ever trust some Waymo car to make some insane left turn across 6 lanes of rush hour traffic out here, let alone the freeway.

I see it as a trial by fire. If Waymo can handle LA, it can handle anywhere (that doesn't have awful weather).

SF traffic seems harder to handle than LA traffic.

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#366
An underrated thing about Waymo:

If you open Uber and the app says a car is 9 minutes away that’s really anywhere from 5 to 15.

With Waymo if they say it’s 9 minutes to get a ride they mean 9 minutes. They’re not waiting for a human to accept your ride, they’re scheduling resources.

The lack of variance makes delays much more tolerable, IMO.

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They have tried many variations out, but so far they don't seem to think they work better than doing nothing. The only communication the Waymo's currently do it to signal that they are stopping for pedestrians, both to the pedestrians themselves and also to the cars behind. https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/13/23913251/waymo-roof-dome...

Even if the cars had a "I'm currently deciding" indicator it would be a major improvement. My only issue with these sorts of anti-socialized services is not being able to promptly and easily sue for remedy. Maybe a blood price on a few mid-level managers (or possibly higher depending on the situation) if the service ends up killing people. That would put my heart at mind in the marketplace of the future.

> "I'm currently deciding" indicator

Million dollar idea right there

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#368

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even if the cars had a "I'm currently deciding" indicator it would be a major improvement. My only issue with these sorts of anti-socialized services is not being able to promptly and easily sue for remedy. Maybe a blood price on a few mid-level managers (or possibly higher depending on the situation) if the service ends up killing people. That would put my heart at mind in the marketplace of the future.

> "I'm currently deciding" indicator Million dollar idea right there

Isn't that constantly happening? Every millisecond it's "deciding" what to do.

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#369
post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ditto as a motorcyclist. Making eye contact with drivers makes riding a lot easier. You know they see you.

When I'm on a motorcycle, I assume they are never seeing me - but it's still useful to see them , and I can often tell what they are about to do before they've started doing it. I have not yet had the chance to share the road with a robot, but I wonder whether that feeling for traffic will still work.

The motorcycle safety courses teaches NOT to assume a driver sees or will yield the right away because of "eye contact".

Re: California Approves Waymo Expansion to Los Angeles and SF Peninsula [pdf]

#370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I'm on a motorcycle, I assume they are never seeing me - but it's still useful to see them , and I can often tell what they are about to do before they've started doing it. I have not yet had the chance to share the road with a robot, but I wonder whether that feeling for traffic will still work.

Yeh, the only time I assume a driver has really seen me is when we make eye contact. (But - twice in 20 years I’ve had the chilling experience of a driver making eye contact and pulling out in front of me anyway.)

I don't think that's actually all that uncommon. I'll give them the benefit of doubt and assume that they habitually turn to look, but don't actually see or that they grossly misjudge your speed.

That was more of a problem in my 'Sturm & Drang' time. These days grannys on their electically-assisted bicycles are faster than me, hence I don't surprise car drivers any more.

Post reply on HN