Earlier quoted context omitted.
Its base64. Its not an encryption.
Sure, but it’s pretty amazing to me that ChatGPT didn’t just hallucinate a response to a generic request to decode a string. It recognized the string as base64, wrote a valid program to decode it, and returned the correct response. Maybe I’m just old and amazed, but that seems pretty cool (terrifying?) to me.
'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
291–300 of 347 posts
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
…mostly big piles of rocks… nothing too special…
So these ancient granite constructions exhibit tool markings of computer-aided design precision, laser cutting, and power drilling. These enormous granite obselisks weigh more than even modern cranes can lift. But they were allegedly "hand-chiseled" and lifted from quarries by a dozen men with ropes. Yet no-one with actual modern computers and lasers and drills and cranes has been able to replicate any of it. Oh and…
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
> My theory is that its darkness is down to the fact that the civilisation there has figured out a way to harness solar energy to near 100% capacity, along the lines of a Dyson sphere That doesn't work quite the way you think. If you harness all the energy your planet will start to glow, first red, then white. Eventually becoming as hot as your star, at which point you stop gaining energy. Unless they are somehow con…
Take incoming energy and make antimatter. Store for use outside of the sphere. That will be my premise for the book I am writing. ;)
Like Starget ZPM.
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perfectly spaced is not a stable orbit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point You want L4 and L5 for that.
That applies to a small body with two large ones, not three similarly sized planets.
Is there any statically stable shared orbit for planets though? The first wobble and they start accelerating toward each other don't they?
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#295"Consider the three largest moons of Jupyter. Europa takes exactly twice as long as IO to orbit Jupyter, and Ganymede takes exactly twice as long as that. How can that be? This is an example of synchronization, but what's the mechanism? That's what this video is about: it's an explanation of something called orbital resonance."
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#296Reminds me of Titius–Bode law[1], where simple equation correctly gave orbits of all the known planets, while predicting one more in asteroid belt and correct distance to Uranus. Only was considered disproven when Neptune didn't work. I would not trust these relations even existing (other than by pure chance). Even less I'd trust any intelligent design behind it [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titius%E2%80%93Bode_l…
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#297The Planets Are Weirdly In Sync - Steve Mould - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qyn64b4LNJ0 "Consider the three largest moons of Jupyter. Europa takes exactly twice as long as IO to orbit Jupyter, and Ganymede takes exactly twice as long as that. How can that be? This is an example of synchronization, but what's the mechanism? That's what this video is about: it's an explanation of something called orbital resonance.…
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#298Reminds me of Titius–Bode law[1], where simple equation correctly gave orbits of all the known planets, while predicting one more in asteroid belt and correct distance to Uranus. Only was considered disproven when Neptune didn't work. I would not trust these relations even existing (other than by pure chance). Even less I'd trust any intelligent design behind it [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titius%E2%80%93Bode_l…
> other than by pure chance Barring intelligent design, there's an extremely good chance that at least one of these systems exist, and an equally good chance that only one exists, and we're just lucky enough to have observed it.
What makes this one unique is that it seems to have avoided disruptive events. Intelligent design and aliens get the pop science web hits while unperturbed defaults do not.
"The current delicate configuration of the
planetary orbits in HD 110067 rules out any violent event over the billion-year history ...making it a rare “fossil” to study migration mechanisms and the properties of its protoplanetary disk in a pristine environment."
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#299The Planets Are Weirdly In Sync - Steve Mould - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qyn64b4LNJ0 "Consider the three largest moons of Jupyter. Europa takes exactly twice as long as IO to orbit Jupyter, and Ganymede takes exactly twice as long as that. How can that be? This is an example of synchronization, but what's the mechanism? That's what this video is about: it's an explanation of something called orbital resonance.…
But that's also what causes the gaps in Saturn's rings. So rubble can't stay in those orbits but planets get locked in them?
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#300My solution to fermi paradox is intelligent civilizations realize futility of life and get enlightened and just die out. Similar to moksha in hinduism.