Earlier quoted context omitted.
That sounds like aliasing issue in signals; we should be able to distinguish between them as long as we sample more often than half the actual orbital period (i.e. with a sampling frequency larger than the Nyquist frequency). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency
Another question, is there something like a max. rotation speed for a planet in a certain distance to a sun of a certain size? Edit as a general response: Question answered, multiple times, thank you! Also, there my basic physics knowledge resurfaces, thank you for that as well!
'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
61–70 of 347 posts
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#62Reminds me of a bit from a novel I read (won't be naming the title to avoid spoilers) where one of the minor twists is that the gigastructure of galaxies that we observe in the universe - the thing that's conducive to things like "star formation" and "life" - is an art project by intelligent species who've been alive since around the time of the Big Bang. (No, it's not part of the Xeelee Sequence :P)
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, perfectly spaced is the only way 3 planets can share the same orbit. And if we go for a gas giant and two small planets, there are probably many of those out there. We almost got one such trio.
Perfectly spaced is not a stable orbit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point You want L4 and L5 for that.
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
That sounds like aliasing issue in signals; we should be able to distinguish between them as long as we sample more often than half the actual orbital period (i.e. with a sampling frequency larger than the Nyquist frequency). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency
Another question, is there something like a max. rotation speed for a planet in a certain distance to a sun of a certain size? Edit as a general response: Question answered, multiple times, thank you! Also, there my basic physics knowledge resurfaces, thank you for that as well!
The only way to vary the speed is a powered orbit, and that's not likely to happen with a planet.
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not convinced until they find a Dyson sphere...
Dyson spheres are probably really rare. It's just bad strategy, everyone within your galaxy knows you're there pretty much immediately when a star just up and disappears one day. Granted, the non-K2s just stare in awe maybe, but the other K2s will fuck your shit up. Can't exactly pack it up and run either, not with a medium-sized star in your suitcase.
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#66What is the "mathematically perfect" aspect of this system? I don't see it in the article.
As detailed in the companion article [1], for every 54 orbits of planet 1, planets 2..6 orbit 36, 24, 16, 12, and 8 times respectively, giving successive ratios of 2/3, 2/3, 2/3, 3/4 and 3/4. After those 54 planet 1 orbits, all planets are in the same relative position. [1] https://www.space.com/six-sub-neptunes-found-100-light-years...
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, perfectly spaced is the only way 3 planets can share the same orbit. And if we go for a gas giant and two small planets, there are probably many of those out there. We almost got one such trio.
Perfectly spaced is not a stable orbit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point You want L4 and L5 for that.
At equal mass the separation increases until they are all equidistant from each other assuming a completely circular orbit.
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but that would be dictated by how fast can it spin before shattering into pieces. So mostly gravity/composition thing, I'd imagine. Many things in solar systems are (postulated to) derive from the rotation of the protoplanetary disk, via conservation of angular momentum - however, planets can also get spun up or down after forming by e.g. collisions with other objects, including extra-system objects.
Just realized, I meant orbit speed and not rotation aeound the planets axis. Shouldn't write in parallel to meetings... Your answer was very interesting so, thank you!
One of the best way to get an intuition for orbits is to play Kerbal Space Program for a few hours :).
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
They might not be planets but planet-sized, artificially-created cities/machinery/engineered objects. Think about it: If you were tasked with creating a planet-sized thing why would you give it anything less than a perfect orbit? You'd also put it in orbit around a super stable dwarf star to maximize the useful life of the project. Even if they are planets, imperfect orbits lead to problems in the looooooong term. An…
Makes me think of how the Puppeteers in Niven's Known Space escaped the explosion at the center of the galaxy by moving 5 planets in this configuration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klemperer_rosette with an inertialess drive that (I think) they bought from the Outsiders.
Re: 'Mathematically perfect' star system being investigated for potential alien tech
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Flexbox will be seen by aliens as alien technology, our peak, our absolute pinnacle before collapse.
LOL, better then them finding the industry 10 years ago.