Can you trust search results without AI summarization? They’re mostly SEO spam.
> The images it generates are, at best, a polished regression to the mean. If you want custom art, pay an artist.
Most visual art that people consume is polished regression to the mean. It’s designed for mass appeal, not originality.
> I want to talk to a person, not a chatbot. The chatbot wastes time while you wait for a person that can actually help.
Have you spoken to an outsourced call center in the last, oh, 20 years?
> I don't want music recommendations from something that can't appreciate or understand music. Human recommendations will always be better.
I’m old enough to remember hearing the same popular song 10 times a day on the local radio station because their rotation was designed for broad appeal to maximize ad sales, not to uncover new and interesting music for eager listeners.
> I don't want AI mediating social interactions that it cannot and does not understand (though it may appear to). If I'm weary of too much volume on any social platform or in any news feed, I'll cut back on what I'm following.
This one I agree with, but it’s been our reality for at least a decade now, not a new development.
> If you're having AI attend a meeting for you, it probably wasn't that important.
True
> If you're having AI write your email, it probably wasn't that important.
Even in important emails there is a lot of “copy”, and AI-generated copy is no worse than human-generated copy. It’s just copy.
> If it's screening job candidates for you, you're missing quality candidates.
If the alternative is keyword screening, I’ll take AI screening, thank you.