Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nostr is the only payment network I've ever used that lets you send payments of less than $0.10.
Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: Nobody that advocates for it understands what it is or how it works.
Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#12Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: An incredible novel solution desperately in search of a problem to solve. The engineering behind this is neat, but I have no idea why this is useful.
Nostr is everything that fediverse social networks claim to be, but aren’t. I was shocked to find out that the Lemmy instance I signed up on was blocking dozens upon dozens of other instances, which defeats the entire purpose of a federated network.
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#13Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: An incredible novel solution desperately in search of a problem to solve. The engineering behind this is neat, but I have no idea why this is useful.
Nostr is everything that fediverse social networks claim to be, but aren’t. I was shocked to find out that the Lemmy instance I signed up on was blocking dozens upon dozens of other instances, which defeats the entire purpose of a federated network.
There is another side of the Fediverse that operates on the principles you are talking about (eg. Poast, Baest, Spinster, Gleasonator, NoAgendaSocial, NicecrewDigital, et al). That part of the Fediverse, like Nostr, is covered in Lolicon, gore, and Nazi memes because that's the userbase you get when you promise that nobody can stop you from posting whatever you want.
More and more I am learning that the people who desire censorship-free social spaces are the kind of people that others rightfully exclude from polite social spaces, because these are people who lack respect and want to say and do horrible things without opposition.
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nostr is everything that fediverse social networks claim to be, but aren’t. I was shocked to find out that the Lemmy instance I signed up on was blocking dozens upon dozens of other instances, which defeats the entire purpose of a federated network.
Then switch to a different one, the point of a federated network is that anyone is able to talk to anyone, not that they have to.
It took me signing up for Lemmy to realize why Lemmy is still a completely dead network.
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: Nobody that advocates for it understands what it is or how it works.
Bitcoin uses secp256k1, Nostr uses secp256k1. I was surprised as anyone to learn that when you exchange money using Nostr clients it is not directed at the private key that you use to sign Nostr messages.
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bitcoin uses secp256k1, Nostr uses secp256k1. I was surprised as anyone to learn that when you exchange money using Nostr clients it is not directed at the private key that you use to sign Nostr messages.
[flagged]
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#17Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: An incredible novel solution desperately in search of a problem to solve. The engineering behind this is neat, but I have no idea why this is useful.
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: Nobody that advocates for it understands what it is or how it works.
Bitcoin uses secp256k1, Nostr uses secp256k1. I was surprised as anyone to learn that when you exchange money using Nostr clients it is not directed at the private key that you use to sign Nostr messages.
Bitcoin was developed just barely before ed25519 was finalized, which is probably why it uses secp256k1. Unless intended mainly for government users (FIPS), almost every new cryptographic system uses ed25519 -- except Nostr.
I always assumed Nostr chose secp256k1 so you could send bitcoin to another Nostr user without some extra "payment address request protocol" bolted on the side. Very surprising that this was not the motivation!
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#19Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: An incredible novel solution desperately in search of a problem to solve. The engineering behind this is neat, but I have no idea why this is useful.
[0] https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/patches-carved-into-d...
Re: Gitstr: Send and receive Git patches over Nostr
#20Nostr really feels to me like the blockchain: An incredible novel solution desperately in search of a problem to solve. The engineering behind this is neat, but I have no idea why this is useful.
I tried nostr and I was impressed by how fast it is compared to the alternatives and by how seamless it is to connect to everyone. Unfortunately I'm not interested by the current content and I'm not sure a social media without censorship is viable on large scale
Right, it absolutely isn't. Some form of censorship is vital. This claim becomes more agreeable when substituting "censorship" with the almost-synonymous word "moderation".