Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh? > 3rd of January until today sits at 1256 searches 1256 / 23 (days between today and Jan 3rd) = 54.6 searches on average per day. Some days higher, some lower. Sometimes it can take a couple of tries to get the search right, so you do 5-10 searches in one minute maybe. Doesn't seem farfetched to me.
> For sure I'd do 300 searches in a week, and on a particularly hairy day I might do it in a day.
Kagi search reached 20k paying members
251–260 of 269 posts
Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#252Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#253Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#254I hardly use search engines anymore. So there's no point in paying for Kagi. 90% of the time I'm not looking for a website, I need the answer to a question. I can either spend 15 minutes sifting through clickbait sites until I finally find the answer, or I can spend 15 seconds asking a chatbot. For the handful times a month I still need to find a webpage there's no point in paying for one..
The reason people like Kagi is that it doesn't show these (anywhere near as much), the top result has the answer
Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#255I hardly use search engines anymore. So there's no point in paying for Kagi. 90% of the time I'm not looking for a website, I need the answer to a question. I can either spend 15 minutes sifting through clickbait sites until I finally find the answer, or I can spend 15 seconds asking a chatbot. For the handful times a month I still need to find a webpage there's no point in paying for one..
> 15 minutes sifting through clickbait sites The reason people like Kagi is that it doesn't show these (anywhere near as much), the top result has the answer
But my point is that they introduced it a little too late. I'd have loved to have something like this a few years ago but now most of my search engine activity is being displaced by LLMs.
And DuckDuckGo already meets my needs enough for when I do still need it (yes I know it's just a skinned version of Bing :) ). And I don't have to bother logging in to it on every computer and phone I own (I easily have 10 computers and 6 mobile devices in my home alone).
Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#256Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#257Earlier quoted context omitted.
Add-ons are terrible because they fingerprint you.Javascript allows for sharing of addons names. Having this niche add-on coupled with your device and browser type, IP, timezone this gives unique fingerprint. This comes from someone who used to have 50+ Firefox add-ons.
Why does this matter?
Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#258Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#259[flagged]
I just cracked open with this comment. How do you drop that out of the blue without even bothering to make an argument?
Re: Kagi search reached 20k paying members
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
Add-ons are terrible because they fingerprint you.Javascript allows for sharing of addons names. Having this niche add-on coupled with your device and browser type, IP, timezone this gives unique fingerprint. This comes from someone who used to have 50+ Firefox add-ons.
"Plugins" like "This browser can natively view PDFs." are detectable via JavaScript. There's no way for a site to see Firefox add-ons.