Earlier quoted context omitted.
as an average joe on the consumer end I don't care about transaction costs. at least here in germany that's the vendor's problem.
Won't the vendors just design their prices in a way that it's economically feasible for them - they just include the transaction costs in the price?
EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
121–130 of 146 posts
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do though. I have been to several who refuse cards for payments below a certain (pretty low) amount.
Minimum amount for card payments , indeed because of fees, is not the same as refusing card payments altogether like the person I replied to wrote. Cash only is not really about card fees...
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#123If I could rig my browser to pay 1 cent for every newspaper article I read, I would happily do so. The biggest issue with paying for news is that you are reduced to a small handful of sources. I would like to read a couple of articles from a hundred sources, not a hundred articles from one source. Not sure this platform solves the problem, but it would be a game changer if it did.
My standard reply to this: https://github.com/pjc50/misc-personal.github.io/blob/master... > If I could rig my browser to pay 1 cent for every newspaper article I read Define "read". And "article". Should you get charged for every link preview you scroll past on Twitter? (see lawsuits! the publishers think you should, or at least that this is copyright infringement) Can I build a page with one "article" plus one thou…
It should be up to your user-agent (aka the browser) to implement your decision and protect you from scammers, just like it happens in the rest of scenarios.
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#124Another one? Europe already has multiple private and secure online payments: for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blik
How is that one private? It is coupled to your bank account so your purchases can be nicely tracked, and to add insult, you also need to use your bank's crappy online banking app
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like a lot of conspiracy theory, there's a core of truth. All you have to do is ask the question "is this system going to be allowed to be used for crime on a huge scale", receive the obvious answer "no", and infer that there will be some control built into the system. Where it leaps into conspiracy is the question of when and whom this will be used against. But it's fairly obvious that measures will be taken against…
This has nothing to do with what GP invented (amount control and expiration date set by central banks). > But it's fairly obvious that measures will be taken against drug sellers, sex workers, banned political parties and so on. Yeah, of course like governments already do with cash! There's a big difference between saying “governments are going to police things” (which is always true, that's their purpose in fact) an…
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is that one private? It is coupled to your bank account so your purchases can be nicely tracked, and to add insult, you also need to use your bank's crappy online banking app
Do you really suppose anyone in the EU will allow you to maka any payments that are completely anonymous/untraceable? I do trust my bank, if I wouldn't trust them I would find another one. I don't see what problem taler is supposed to solve.
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Minimum amount for card payments , indeed because of fees, is not the same as refusing card payments altogether like the person I replied to wrote. Cash only is not really about card fees...
But if you only sell low value items, it may not be worth it, especially if you won’t loose many customers because most customers have cash at hand.
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That may make it a politically acceptable substitute for cash. I think you misspelled un acceptable. Anonymous donations are a massive source of corruption, which is why they tend to be capped by law (and even then, I'm sure a lot of bad people manage to get around it). Political money needs total transparency. (Unless you meant "more acceptable to the general public for average transactions"; in which case I agree…
It is much better for govt as well. Instead of having untracked cash flows not paying taxes, now you can ensure taxes are paid (in EU seller is responsible for paying taxes). So your local govt can sell you this new (old) system as being just like cash, decentralised, anonymous, with no banking institutions at play, while having a closer watch on increasingly convoluted tax codes. As for donations, it's still good. I…
Blockchain payments are tracked, so are bank movements; that's not the problem. The problem with blockchain solutions (well, one of many) is that they're pseudonymous, so authorities have to work to demonstrate that account X is linked to person A. Compare with the regular banking system, where every account must have a real identity attached: from the government's perspective, banks are so much better, and they already work (through Visa/MasterCard/Amex). Governments have absolutely no incentive to accept or push an anonymous digital currency. None whatsoever. The more anonymous a currency is (and this one is a bit more anonymous than blockchains), the worse it looks from the perspective of the state.
Re: EU NGI TALER will bring private and secure online payments to the Eurozone
#129"..funded as pilot under the Next Generation Internet (NGI) initiative within the European Commission.." pilot + next gen + initiative + european commission . This combination of terms == no action.
The last time I participated in a project with all those terms (not 'next gen, it was' future', but the idea is the same), it gave birth to the legislation that forces manufacturers to keep providing spare parts 10 years after product EOL, and to provide plans for independants builders after that. Long winded way of saying 'you're wrong'.