Live data from Hacker News

How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

nytimes.com

51–60 of 215 posts

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#51

There is a really important lesson from all of this, and it is not that Apple is wrong for rationally exploiting global tax laws to avoid paying US taxes. The fact that California has no tax jurisdiction in Nevada, and that the US has no tax jurisdiction in Ireland, is an unassailable fact of life. Tax laws are subject to regulatory competition like many other things, and ignoring that -- insisting that this is an is…

Are you like an internet economist or something?

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course it is an issue of morality. I could choose to avoid paying taxes in the society that I'm a part of. It would be in my economic interest to do so. But it is morally wrong because it is that same society that enables me to make my money in the first place. Simple, right?

That doesn't make any sense at all. Tax avoidance is perfectly legal. Tax evasion is not. Playing within the rules created by society is not morally wrong. Every deduction you take on your personal income taxes falls under tax avoidance which you can't possibly be describing as morally wrong. "The legal right of an individual to decrease the amount of what would otherwise be his taxes or altogether avoid them, by mea…

Legal and Moral are two, at best, loosely coupled concepts. Just because something is perfectly legal doesn't make it moral. Or for that matter just because something is illegal doesn't necessarily make it immoral.

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#53
So when the state takes 50% of the salary, it's bad but it's life. It's what the state needs to survive and enhance.

When companies pay 0% tax rate, quick, defend them. If they did pay the tax, the CA state certainly wouldn't have any money problem. But no, that's not important, right? Shares etc are!

I'm surprised everyone finds it ok. I'd almost dare to say it's an issue that is especially present in the US (that people think it's fine and to "blame the game not the player" kind of crap)

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ireland can't lower it's taxes to the point of unprofitability, so it will lower it's taxes until revenues raised == cost of services + small margin. That's a good thing. Don't complain that others provide the same service at lower cost, try to innovate and outcompete them.

Well Bush II lowered taxes to the point of unprofitability (I assume you are speaking from a national governmental view). Governments engage in deficit spending and some foolishly lowers taxes at the behest of its monied interests. You appear to assign to the government of Ireland some sort of rationality and ignore things like regulatory capture and corruption. Your belief that a government will only lower until "re…

"Well Bush II lowered taxes to the point of unprofitability"

The US has been running up the debt for many years http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_pu...

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#56
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shaming them for what? They're simply taking advantage of the confusing and loophole filled tax laws you provided them. Nobody pays more taxes than they absolutely have to. If you don't want people to abuse loopholes, fix the loopholes.

Using loopholes when you know they are loopholes seems pretty immoral to me. You don’t have to agree with me on that, but that would for example be a prime reason for shaming them. Morals are not equal to the law. Immoral things stay immoral even if they are legal. And there is nothing wrong with calling out immoral behavior.

Some people would say collecting tax is already immoral.

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well Bush II lowered taxes to the point of unprofitability (I assume you are speaking from a national governmental view). Governments engage in deficit spending and some foolishly lowers taxes at the behest of its monied interests. You appear to assign to the government of Ireland some sort of rationality and ignore things like regulatory capture and corruption. Your belief that a government will only lower until "re…

"Well Bush II lowered taxes to the point of unprofitability" The US has been running up the debt for many years http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_pu...

What you say is true. What I said is true too. Both statements are true. Bush II tax cuts are a very large portion of the current deficient that we have. Taxes are currently at a 50 year low as a percent of GDP. Bush II taxes greatly increased the deficit. Other tax cuts have too. I was just giving an example of the statement that I responded to being false.

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#59
I think it is pretty simple. Apple and any other company is required AND expected by its shareholders to minimize taxes paid and keep all expenses under control. Saying "well gee we should pay more tax, it's really the right thing to do, lets change around a bunch of stuff so we pay a higher rate of tax" would never fly.

Re: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If the US had a globally competitive corporate tax rate (say 15%), it would make most of these tactics irrelevant. Until Ireland further lowers its taxes. Your argument leads to a race to the bottom. The problem with only taxing dividends is that corporations only pay out a small portion of their profits in dividends. I may theoretically be a billionaire in my holdings, but I only need a million in dividends per ye…

Ireland can't lower it's taxes to the point of unprofitability, so it will lower it's taxes until revenues raised == cost of services + small margin. That's a good thing. Don't complain that others provide the same service at lower cost, try to innovate and outcompete them.

One thing to bear in mind is that for these really big companies, the huge attraction of Ireland is not the low corporate tax rate, it's that profits can be easily and legally sent to Holland, from where they can be sent to the Caribbean. I've seen similar stories from Google and Ikea, I believe they both pay low single digit tax rates on their non-US income due to this arrangement; in Ikea's case this is nearly all of it. It's really difficult to compete with that.
Post reply on HN