Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the reason i did all this is for the lols Do the lols while you still can, the Trust and Safety departments at major social media companies want to extinguish funny. Everyone who does even a smidgen of memeing on the internet knows what happens when you post images of large spiders. People start talking about burning things down, like the entire building its inside of, etc. Someone posted a video where a little gir…
The only hope you have is to accept the fact that you're already cancelled. The sooner you accept that, the sooner you'll be able to function as a shiposter is supposed to function: without mercy, without anxiety, without remorse. All shiposting depends upon it.
Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
81–90 of 120 posts
Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the reason i did all this is for the lols Do the lols while you still can, the Trust and Safety departments at major social media companies want to extinguish funny. Everyone who does even a smidgen of memeing on the internet knows what happens when you post images of large spiders. People start talking about burning things down, like the entire building its inside of, etc. Someone posted a video where a little gir…
Meanwhile someone was using my late brother's name and face(in a list of supposed "vaccine casualties". My brother died from heart failure after lifelong illness, age 39) to spread vile antivaxx/protrump stuff. All reports denied. It was glaringly obvious she was a paid misinfo troll.
Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#83Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#84I'm curious, what exactly would a VC or MSFT want with htmx? Just talent? or the actual product/tech?
I don't think there's much VCs would want w/htmx: it's a really simple concept implemented in a single js file w/no moats or obvious market opportunities as far as i can tell, and I'm a one man shop. I think I got the calls because htmx trended on twitter a couple of times. MSFT might want it because it's gotten a lot of attention lately (finished #2 in https://risingstars.js.org/2023/en#section-framework for 2023) a…
[1]: https://techcrunch.com/2023/02/16/sequoia-backs-open-source-...
[2]: https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/sequoia-open-source-fello...
Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#85Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just a question, I don't pay much attention to politics, are the two related? are anti vaxers pro trump? The vaccine was developed on Trumps watch. I figured it was just like any other boss, takes all the credit if it works. desperately tries to shift blame if it does not.
There's some correlation, and while Trump tried to take credit for Operation Warp Speed for a while[0], he distanced himself from everything related to "Covid is a threat" (including "it needs vaccines") when the tide shifted in his voter base and they went fiercely antivax, antidistancing, antilockdown, ... [0] the process was pretty much the same speed for non-participants in non-participant countries, but okay: hi…
Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
i do. what now?
may you and the people relying on you never have to rely on the maintainers taking things more seriously than they've shown themselves to in their public positioning
Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#88This made me wonder what the shortest open source license is, and it seems to be the Fair License: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_License > > > Usage of the works is permitted provided that this instrument is retained with the works, so that any entity that uses the works is notified of this instrument. > > DISCLAIMER: THE WORKS ARE WITHOUT WARRANTY. EDIT: I would not use this license. I'm not sure how this got a…
The works can be used as long as this instrument is kept alongside them to notify users. The works are provided without warranty.
Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#89Re: Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
#90The state of software licenses makes me a bit sad. On the one hand we have open source licenses like the MIT and Apache 2.0 licenses that give corporations free reign to enclose and exploit the software commons without any real limit or any requirement to give back to the things they are getting rich off of, and then on the other hand we have the GPL and LGPL licenses which are too aggressive and stringent, while als…
I like the MPL 2.0 and use it for some of my own software as it best seems to describe the outcome that I want (incorporate it into whatever you want, but please contribute improvements to the MPL licensed parts of the software back to upstream). However, I also think it's fairly easy to circumvent for a hypothetical leech that just wants to use my code without contributing back any improvements. Namely just put the…