Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can say the same thing to Haskell, Curry, Ada or (more or less) Python as well.
Neither Ada Lovelace nor Haskell Curry is still alive. And Python is in a different category. It's one thing to use the name of a historical figure, quite another to use the recognisable mark of a living person. Of course, it could all be being done with endorsement, in which case, my comment is invalid, but otherwise it's incredibly rude and a borderline civil tort.
Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
61–70 of 124 posts
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#62Is this actually affiliated with Roger Penrose? Seems extraordinarily rude to use his name otherwise. Was his permission sought? In fact, this may be seen as "passing off" in English law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose
There's enough other Penroses to choose from; sir Roger doesn't own the (sur)name.
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Neither Ada Lovelace nor Haskell Curry is still alive. And Python is in a different category. It's one thing to use the name of a historical figure, quite another to use the recognisable mark of a living person. Of course, it could all be being done with endorsement, in which case, my comment is invalid, but otherwise it's incredibly rude and a borderline civil tort.
I also believe that passing off requires a demonstration of a substantial amount of probable damage in the future. The mere existence of a graphical software named Penrose can't do much harm. (If you name a malware after Penrose, that may be the case though.)
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#64Is this actually affiliated with Roger Penrose? Seems extraordinarily rude to use his name otherwise. Was his permission sought? In fact, this may be seen as "passing off" in English law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_(surname) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose There's enough other Penroses to choose from; sir Roger doesn't own the (sur)name.
I doubt this would come to court. The main problem is the temerity of using the name of a living person in this way. But, they could have sought permission, in which case, all is well.
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#65Oh, I thought these would be to create spacetime diagrams. As in Penrose Diagrams: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_diagram
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#66Penrose looks great. Beautiful diagrams and readable code. What are some other text-driven diagramming languages / tools? I know of: https://mermaid.js.org/ https://graphviz.org/ https://flowchart.fun/
I assume the future is an LLM where you specify everything in plain english...
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_(surname) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose There's enough other Penroses to choose from; sir Roger doesn't own the (sur)name.
Yes, but his name is the obvious one. If I say "Dyson" and you're in the UK, you think of vacuums, "Penrose" and you think of Mathematical Physics. I doubt this would come to court. The main problem is the temerity of using the name of a living person in this way. But, they could have sought permission, in which case, all is well.
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#68A lot of replies here are missing the key idea behind Penrose: that the "substance" and "style" of any mathematical diagram are separable. For example, the "substance" of a diagram might be a collection of sets with known subset relationships: Set A, B, C IsSubset(B, A) IsSubset(C, A) That same substance can then be rendered in many different styles, e.g. as a Venn diagram or as a tree diagram (substance vs. style is…
Given the popularity of frameworks like TailwindCSS, it seems that people here don’t understand the advantage of separating HTML and CSS either, so I’m not sure if this analogy is helpful…
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#69What's wrong with Pic? Been around for decades.
Pic is wonderful! I think what's lacking the most is modern tool integration. It more or less requires troff which is itself somewhat deprecated. I've always thought that extracting pic as standalone tool with ~modern output objects would be a nice project for once I quit being lazy :)
Re: Penrose – Create diagrams by typing notation in plain text
#70Penrose looks great. Beautiful diagrams and readable code. What are some other text-driven diagramming languages / tools? I know of: https://mermaid.js.org/ https://graphviz.org/ https://flowchart.fun/