Live data from Hacker News

LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

tomshardware.com

51–60 of 256 posts

Re: LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

#51

> In a follow-up post a day after his initial Tweet, Johnie noted “inaccuracy in the ASUS router tool.” Other LG smart washing machine users showed device data use from their apps. It turns out that these appliances more typically use less than 1MB per day.

A megabyte a day still seems excessive.

It seems completely inconsequential

Re: LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

#53

> In a follow-up post a day after his initial Tweet, Johnie noted “inaccuracy in the ASUS router tool.” Other LG smart washing machine users showed device data use from their apps. It turns out that these appliances more typically use less than 1MB per day.

A megabyte a day still seems excessive.

It's 12 bytes per second, or less than 1kB per minute. Doesn't seem like much.

Re: LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

#54
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm totally with you, except a notification that it's finished would actually be really helpful. It's apparently possible to track a washing machine's progress with a smart switch that monitors power draw; I've got one lying around so might try to implement that soon, to complement my hacky RPi-Ring-doorbell-announcer :)

Siri set a timer for *looks at washer screen* minutes That's it. But tbh wish my smart speakers would learn all the appliance chimes instead.

You are still dependent on a smart gadget but with less quality.

Re: LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

#55

I'm not opposed to smart homes, I love being able to turn my lights on and off from across the room. But I don't know if I understand the use case for a networked washing machine.

I have an LG Washer/Dryer with smart functions. As others have said, the notifications are useful, but you can also track the wash/dry cycle and see what it's done so far, what is left and the estimated remaining time. I like it because the smart features are optional and are genuinely useful.

My sister has such a smart washer and funds these same features useful.

I had to helo her get it connected to wifi - it would not stay connected. Turns out she was on the same channel as literally all her neighbors.

Re: LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

#56
post #37
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm totally with you, except a notification that it's finished would actually be really helpful. It's apparently possible to track a washing machine's progress with a smart switch that monitors power draw; I've got one lying around so might try to implement that soon, to complement my hacky RPi-Ring-doorbell-announcer :)

Definitively possible. It’s what I do with my dumb washing machine. Just have your home automation tool of choice notify you if power draw moves below 5w or something.

We live in a smaller appartment building with a shared laundry room with two machines. They both say exactly how many minutes the laundry has left so we just set our timer for the last machine. They take between 35 and 55 minutes per run. We can run 6-8 machines in the five hour slot we can book. Since they slowly get desynced depending on what program you run, there is no need to get a notification. You have 20 minutes to sit until the next machine needs taking care of :-)

Re: LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

#59
post #17

I'm not opposed to smart homes, I love being able to turn my lights on and off from across the room. But I don't know if I understand the use case for a networked washing machine.

I'm totally with you, except a notification that it's finished would actually be really helpful. It's apparently possible to track a washing machine's progress with a smart switch that monitors power draw; I've got one lying around so might try to implement that soon, to complement my hacky RPi-Ring-doorbell-announcer :)

Wait an hour. It’s done.

Re: LG washing machine sending 3.7GB of data a day

#60
While I get the appeal of having networked devices that you can access from anywhere, I want local control for everything. Sure, a cloud option on top is nice, but local first!

I feel that the current solution to "control from anywhere" is the laziest and most privacy invasive. Also, when XYZ company shuts down there service in 2 years and abandons your product, you might not even be able to use it anymore. What a waste.

Post reply on HN