Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The GPT Store

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

91–100 of 132 posts

Re: The GPT Store

#91

Post by shikon7 »

cedws wrote: post #41
minimaxir wrote: post #18

OpenAI today updated their Usage Policy to include the GPT Store: https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies > We want to make sure that GPTs in the GPT Store are appropriate for all users. For example, GPTs that contain profanity in their names or that depict or promote graphic violence are not allowed in our Store. We also don’t allow GPTs dedicated to fostering romantic companionship or performing regulated activi…

I wonder what the reasoning is for banning "romantic companionship."

It seems to me that OpenAI’s vision of an AGI doesn’t include romantic companionship

Re: The GPT Store

#92

Post by rymiel »

sdwr wrote: post #70
mistymountains wrote: post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or, just maybe, AGI is a mirage with the bulk of its current utility as a marketing tool for much more realistic, if ultimately mundane, applications. OpenAI, of course, knows this.

Whether it's real or illusory, I feel like they turned the bitrate down significantly since launch. I'm not getting as many smart electrons per question as I used to.

This is measurably true. They claim they don't know why because "they haven't changed anything" but it is true at the very least

Re: The GPT Store

#93

Post by whitten »

throwup238 wrote: post #27
achrono wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That (fallacious) argument applies to nearly every other "tech" platform, from YouTube to Hacker News. The barrier being low is not the problem -- the question is how high does the ceiling go. Is this thing capable only of preconfigured prompts based on a customized data upload, or something vastly more?

Yeah and Youtube is absolutely swimming in garbage. Without dang, Hacker News would be too.

Could you elaborate ? What is dang ?

Re: The GPT Store

#94

Post by keyle »

chupapimunyenyo wrote: post #86
keyle wrote: post #72

I hope they don't lose focus on their only moat: ChatGPT+ It's been running quite slow with a lot of fails lately, sometimes it downrights invites you to do the research yourself! Screw that one up, and I walk... openzephyrchat-v0.2.Q5_K_M.gguf and speechless-code-mistral-7b-v1.0.Q5_K_M.gguf have been really excellent to work with for most of my use cases.

https://youryoure.com/?lose

Second language speaker here! Thanks!

Re: The GPT Store

#95

Post by nl »

jadbox wrote: post #46
mrtksn wrote: post #20

If you haven't see it already, there's Rabbit r1[0] which takes the "in the future there wouldn't be individual apps" approach and on the other hand OpenAI seems to adopt the "in the future, we will host all the apps" approach. I'm curious who will win this one but IMHO there's a value in having an individual well defined app even though I previously argued that in the future there wouldn't be individual apps. The va…

I want a thing like the rabbit, but it is with open source hardware and software. I might even be open to having ambient listening if I could host all the data.

You want https://usefulsensors.com/, specifically https://www.crowdsupply.com/useful-sensors/ai-in-a-box

This is from Pete Warden: https://petewarden.com/

Re: The GPT Store

#96

Post by marenkay »

JKCalhoun wrote: post #74

This ChatGPT/AI thing kind of freaks me out the more I peek at it. I think what I am beginning to realize is that, regardless of what you think of ChatGPT right now, we've only just scratched the surface. We're standing here poking at this new and curious thing. I'm thinking back to when I first fired up NCSA Mosaic on a Mac Quadra (or whatever). What did I think of this World Wide Web? Did I immediately see the disa…

It seems like you are comparing to hyper capitalism taking over the internet and reduction of value for money spent, which would be appropriate for ChatGPT since it basically ushers in the area of paying a lot for zero value. Streaming and digital goods was same price for half value, ChatGPT is the capitalist wet dream of money for nothing since the giant energy costs are mostly paid by society as externalised costs.

Re: The GPT Store

#97

Post by dbtc »

gsharma wrote: post #67
jm4 wrote: post #17

It's silly that you can't even see what these things can do without having a $20/mo subscription. They have one line descriptions for each one, but it doesn't really tell you what it actually does. They need to add a feature list and provide some examples for each one of these. There is zero reason for anyone to start a new subscription when you don't even know what the app does.

To be fair, if the GPT creator doesn’t do a good job of explaining the GPT, you can’t really tell even if you pay $20. The only way is to try out the GPT and hope you hit the right features. Chat is a pretty bad interface to discover features.

Not really, just ask about the features.

Re: The GPT Store

#99

Post by whoIsYou »

mistymountains wrote: post #62
habosa wrote: post #60

Running an app store for consumers just seems wayyyy off course from their stated goal of building AGI. Running any kind of two-sided marketplace with paying customers is quite a big undertaking, I just can't see how this is the best use of their resources and attention if they want to pursue their mission.

Or, just maybe, AGI is a mirage with the bulk of its current utility as a marketing tool for much more realistic, if ultimately mundane, applications. OpenAI, of course, knows this.

maybe they need some sort of profit center to keep themselves funded to reach their goals

Re: The GPT Store

#100

Post by fooker »

whitten wrote: post #93
throwup238 wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah and Youtube is absolutely swimming in garbage. Without dang, Hacker News would be too.

Could you elaborate ? What is dang ?

GPT 6 bakported to the past to combat GPT 4 generated spam and GPT 5 guided scam.
Post reply on HN