As others in the tech scene have said, it might be hard to find the real valuable GPTs since the barrier to build is so low. At least with the app scene, learning Swift/Javascript/ObjC created a barrier, with ChatGPT store anyone and everyone can create a GPT.
The GPT Store
11–20 of 132 posts
Re: The GPT Store
#12Finally! But with so many alternatives already out there such as https://gptstore.ai , what do you expect the official one can do more?
Doesn’t need to. 99% of users never heard of gptstore.ai
Re: The GPT Store
#13[flagged]
Probably working out legal and tax considerations. It's a first step. They either start up in the US first or wait too long working out the whole world and allow competitors to get a leg up.
Re: The GPT Store
#14As others in the tech scene have said, it might be hard to find the real valuable GPTs since the barrier to build is so low. At least with the app scene, learning Swift/Javascript/ObjC created a barrier, with ChatGPT store anyone and everyone can create a GPT.
And also the functionality scope and incentives are pretty poor right now.
For instance I'm trying to work out if I should make a GPT of Summer AI, well I would have to ask the user their location (like Alltrails GPT does) which is a poor experience and I'd have to forgo the usual subscription (which doesn't even cover server costs) and take whatever their "usage" based comp is.
I suspect in a few months when they add options for fetching more data, more interoperability with other apps and services, and if they add better monetization, then the GPT store will get some really interesting GPT's added.
Re: The GPT Store
#15Finally! But with so many alternatives already out there such as https://gptstore.ai , what do you expect the official one can do more?
[deleted]
Re: The GPT Store
#16Made this one awhile ago to speed up scaffolding for some SaaS dev, and it works 'ok'. https://chat.openai.com/g/g-iFDxja3KI-bootstrap-express-post... ...has anyone had success with your own GPTs?
Re: The GPT Store
#17It's silly that you can't even see what these things can do without having a $20/mo subscription. They have one line descriptions for each one, but it doesn't really tell you what it actually does. They need to add a feature list and provide some examples for each one of these. There is zero reason for anyone to start a new subscription when you don't even know what the app does.
Re: The GPT Store
#18OpenAI today updated their Usage Policy to include the GPT Store: https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies
> We want to make sure that GPTs in the GPT Store are appropriate for all users. For example, GPTs that contain profanity in their names or that depict or promote graphic violence are not allowed in our Store. We also don’t allow GPTs dedicated to fostering romantic companionship or performing regulated activities.
> These policies may be enforced automatically at submission time or applied retroactively upon further review.
Re: The GPT Store
#19What is going on with their rollouts or A/B testing or whatever they're doing? They have this big announcement, and yet my paid account doesn't show this functionality at all.
Re: The GPT Store
#20If you haven't see it already, there's Rabbit r1[0] which takes the "in the future there wouldn't be individual apps" approach and on the other hand OpenAI seems to adopt the "in the future, we will host all the apps" approach.
I'm curious who will win this one but IMHO there's a value in having an individual well defined app even though I previously argued that in the future there wouldn't be individual apps. The value, I think, is that having an object with a statement gives you a spark of ideas and trust through branding. The branding part might be the "killer app", if you think about it we are and we live among biological neural networks who are about capable the same but then we go around and specialise in things and then seek individual personas since we don't have a way to measure the quality of the output in advance.