[flagged]
Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
11–20 of 220 posts
Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#12Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#13[flagged]
You don’t care about the impact on your health or your children’s health? That seems short sighted to me.
For a lot of cooking, gas is simply superior in almost every way to induction or electric. Induction has a few advantages in certain situations, but not many - gas is more flexible.
Now there is something to be said about people using insufficient extraction or not maintaining their ventilation/extraction systems for sure, or grossly underspeccing them so that they aren’t worth a shit.
Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#14[flagged]
After trying induction for a couple of years, I now believe it's superior to gas.
Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#15[flagged]
Resistive heating? Sure. Those things are nasty. But otherwise... nothing beats 7.2 kW of inductive energy transfer straight into the bottom of your pan.
Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#16Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#17[flagged]
After trying induction for a couple of years, I now believe it's superior to gas.
Induction is fine for some people but not for everyone. Not to mention in many places they are more expensive to buy and operate. Besides, venting your stove makes gas perfectly safe. The process of cooking creates more harmful gasses anyhow. Burning toast will freak any monitor out.
Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#18A very comprehensive video on that topic : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hX2aZUav-54
Re: Gas utilities used tobacco tactics to avoid gas stove regulations
#19Let’s let adults be adults and buy whatever stove they want.
And what about the adults who wouldn’t have chosen a gas stove if they had balanced and factual information rather than information tainted by corporate influence?