Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nah mate, you’ve got to be realistic. No human will ever accept a downward adjustment. Plus, meeting in the middle is even less sustainable than the current situation. The options are: - Dramatically less (like prehistoric levels) - Dramatically more (star trek)
What about Solarpunk[0]? That could almost be the middle between Pre-Historic and Star Trek. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solarpunk
US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
181–190 of 207 posts
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about Solarpunk[0]? That could almost be the middle between Pre-Historic and Star Trek. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solarpunk
Every happy person depicted in solarpunk artwork is the survivor of a mass casualty event and one of the few lucky people who aren't enslaved in manual labor colonies. That's the only way the solarpunk economy makes any sense.
Maybe ecological collapse after decades of growing the economy. After all, shareholder are worth more than humans :)
> one of the few lucky people who aren't enslaved in manual labor
Actually, we got quite a few of them, right now.
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#183I guess steel isn't considered a critical asset for US industry to be in foreign hands.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/green-steel-is-coming-europe-is...
China also doing its moves to lead
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every happy person depicted in solarpunk artwork is the survivor of a mass casualty event and one of the few lucky people who aren't enslaved in manual labor colonies. That's the only way the solarpunk economy makes any sense.
> Every happy person depicted in solarpunk artwork is the survivor of a mass casualty event Maybe ecological collapse after decades of growing the economy. After all, shareholder are worth more than humans :) > one of the few lucky people who aren't enslaved in manual labor Actually, we got quite a few of them, right now.
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
> what do we say to poor people? Sorry your life sucks, but the economy is big enough now? we talk to rich people and tell them, "Sorry, but we've f*cked poor people long enough now, time to adjust downwards and meet in the middle."
The Plan: Convince Western countries, which are mostly some form of republic or a parliamentary system emulating one, to lower their citizens' living standards, in order to theoretically set a better example of resource usage for developing countries, who will 100% ignore this supposed role-modeling anyway because they actually want the best possible living standards, like most people do, and they have a point that e…
i can't change what China does, i can't really change what my country does. i can barely influence what my family and friends do.
but i refuse to believe that "just grow the economy and gather more resources" is a viable path.
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Every happy person depicted in solarpunk artwork is the survivor of a mass casualty event Maybe ecological collapse after decades of growing the economy. After all, shareholder are worth more than humans :) > one of the few lucky people who aren't enslaved in manual labor Actually, we got quite a few of them, right now.
True. I will give the Solarpunk people that much. Like Marx they have identified a real problem with society. Like Marx their proposed solution isn't going to work. In some respects it reminds me of this obscure, old web comic, in which the protagonists embark on their glorious future but forget to bring their inexhaustible labor robots. https://www.angryflower.com/348.html
Ah, maybe that's why I like Solarpunk so much...
> In some respects it reminds me of this obscure, old web comic
which makes fun of the bourgeoisie who notice that they're not worth a lot without the proletariat ;)
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#187This will be interesting. I wonder what will happen to Dr Larrin Thomas ( https://knifesteelnerds.com/about-me/ ) he's been able to bring some new knife steels to market while working for US Steel by day. Wonder if Nippon allows side gigs.
I do have a bar of 40-layered high-carbon steel from Nippon Steel and another one of white-paper-and-low-carbon-steel with a iron (!) core from Hitachi in the basement waiting to be forged into swords. So, going from that, I think the Japanese (!) management should be fine, the local US management might different so. Thanks for the link, some great resources on that site!
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
$200/month probably included their health plan.
It did not, health plan was covered by a separate charge through the university or through student's own continued coverage from parents.
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
Japan supplied sub-par metal for decades and lied about it. Aluminum, copper and steel. Something to think about next time you get anywhere near a car, train, airplane, skyscraper, or bridge. https://money.cnn.com/2017/10/16/news/companies/kobe-steel-s...
I hoped someone would have additional data to add, thanks! Is a scandal at one company evidence for the entire industry in a country? Is there similar information about other Japanese companies? What about the industry at large? The prevailing sentiment is that Chinese steel has similar issues.
Re: US Steel, once the largest corporation, agrees to sell to Nippon Steel
#190> US Steel has agreed to be bought by Nippon Steel, Japan’s largest steelmaker, in a $14.1 billion deal. > Earlier this summer the United Steelworkers union vowed to only support a proposed offer by another unionized American steel company, Cleveland Cliffs, to buy US Steel, in a cash and stock deal then valued at $32.53 a share, or 40% less than Nippon’s all cash offer. The US Steel board rejected that offer and sta…
on why it failed: > US Steel and other steelmakers eventually followed those foreign competitors to upgrade factories and equipment, but they still largely used the older methods to make steel by melting raw materials such as iron ore in giant blast furnaces. > Those “integrated” steelmakers soon lagged behind so-called “mini-mills,” nonunion competitors that use more efficient electric arc furnaces to turn old steel…
Not really? The difference is referred to as "primary" vs "secondary" steelmaking.
The US pumped out enormous quantities of steel from 1910-1980ish and then usage decreased as better computer models as well as plastics allowed a lot more efficient use of the material. This meant that a bunch of used steel was available and nobody could really consume steel fast anymore.
Consequently, "secondary" small mills recycling used steel were WAY more profitable than "primary" large mills making it from ore. This devastated the US steel industry which was mostly "primary" (some of that has changed).
Then ... China ... started consuming vast quantities of steel for development. At some point, China bought up and used most of the used steel that was available.
So ... today ... "secondary" steel is rising because the cheap used steel isn't laying around anymore. "Primary" steel is making a comeback as you need to produce original feedstock or the "secondary" producers have nothing to work with.
The correct answer to all this is: it's a balance. You need some primary steelmaking or you simply run out of feedstock. You need some secondary steelmaking to tweak the type of steel and provide smaller, specialty runs.