Earlier quoted context omitted.
One may wonder if the real goal was to create an antitrust case rather than a working app.
How is this a demonstration of "antitrust"? Apple does not unfairly prevent competition for messaging apps, as evidenced by a plethora of competition for messaging apps, plenty of which are far more popular on iPhone outside of the US. Apple faces the heat of this competition - it frequently adds features to iMessage to make it equal or better than it's competition. Voice notes through iMessage was a direct reaction…
Feel free to use the open standard but don't be iMessage.
I'm a long time beeper user. It's been nice to sign up with my email, and at least be in a few of the iPhone only chats.
When I saw Eric's post the other day, my first thought was 'what an arrogant dumbass.' My guess was that they though they have an anti trust case, and my guess is that apple may have thought the same, and so they enabled 'iMessage' access to RCS.
This was so predictable, especially after the RCS announcement, that I messaged my group threads and said they'd be borked by the end of the week, please switch back to signal.
So, I think I'll ride that train until RCS is a thing and be done with beeper. I honestly think they just shot themselves in the foot.
https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/16/23964171/apple-iphone-rc...