I actually wonder if in the limit of video encoding we could just get a diffusion model that can in real time render realistic video based on a script. Then downloading a movie is just downloading a few megabytes of a prompt and you get a movie playing based off it locally.
Wouldn't it be non-deterministic? (Legit question, I'm new to this)
Now I can just print that video
111–120 of 123 posts
Re: Now I can just print that video
#112Re: Now I can just print that video
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think ideally the creator would be compensated by PrintThatVideo, who is taking their content and repurposing it.
I mean, I expect someone to make this a module for something than can be ran on your own computer with LLAMA (or whatever) in pretty short order. The attention market cycle is wrapping up and at this rate AI/LLMs will further kill the market for grabbing your attention by filtering that crap out. Grab the signal, filter the noise. Yuval Noah Harari is likely correct, the future isn't about attention, it's about intim…
Re: Now I can just print that video
#114You could even do a little line drawing of the important bits.
You could keep this "cook" book in your kitchen, and maybe pass it to one of your kids (just an example) when they move out or something.
Re: Now I can just print that video
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So he's using the same bit of friction that this article is trying to solve, to fill his rice bowl. You spelled out exactly what the attention economy is about. Friction . The money is made on friction. Waste - of time, of cognitive effort, of emotions good and bad. I feel sorry for this guy, but at the same time, I wish people recognized that attention economy isn't about some nebulous attention you have too much…
the guy deserves to be compensated for his efforts. I think this is a pretty pessimistic take.
Re: Now I can just print that video
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So he's using the same bit of friction that this article is trying to solve, to fill his rice bowl. You spelled out exactly what the attention economy is about. Friction . The money is made on friction. Waste - of time, of cognitive effort, of emotions good and bad. I feel sorry for this guy, but at the same time, I wish people recognized that attention economy isn't about some nebulous attention you have too much…
I get it, but most content -- that you and I find helpful in so many different cases -- exists because it can be monetized. And, to your point, friction-based monetization is one of the more effective ways to monetize your content. If you can't monetize your content, what's the point in creating it? Creating a lot of this content takes time, and therefore many people won't create it if it's not worth their time. If t…
No. People will create without incentive. put multiple humans in a box and wait, and culture will spontaneously be generated. Income is not, never will be, and has never, been a nessacary part of this equation.
In general ive observed a tragic cycle of vibrant communities blossoming into existence where everyone created because they want to, people have healthy engagement with it and get primarily positive vibes. Then over time, money invades, starts paying a select few of the creators and arbitrarily excluding others with no partiuclar pattern. Bad vibes ensue, and even those paid have to run in place and burn out. Content quality suffers, becoming less about creative expression and making audience happy, and more about extracting clicks, money, ads, buy, subscribe, like
Re: Now I can just print that video
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you considered paying for the patreon regardless because you consume his content one way or another and value it?
I consume hundreds or thousands of creators' content that I value more than this particular channel. If I felt the duty to donate to each one, let alone subscribe , I would consume much less of it and live in a smaller world. Perhaps it is a rationalization, but I don't feel that consuming content that someone offers to me for free creates an obligation on my part, whether I love it or not.
Justifying why it's okay to feel entitled to the content for free (due to lots of available free content) even though it provides a personal value to you is what oversteps in the wrong direction to me, if that's part of your take.
I should probably clarify that merely grabbing or holding your attention is not what I mean by providing value. I mean it saves you time, it gives you conversation topics, it helps you grow, its something you look forward to consuming, it isnt just taking attention you didnt know what to do with, etc. In kther words, there's something specific to the content that resonates with you.
Its possible you just don't value this content all that much, even if you do appreciate it and find it interesting - which is okay.
Value is very subjective and personal, there's no way to codify what I'm saying here.
And it's also fair to argue that you are paying for most of these things with your time and attention, although with your specific example an improvement was theorized that would give you the same value while saving you time, and that translated to paying the creator less. Something about the specifics there didn't seem right
Re: Now I can just print that video
#118Definitely would use this. Instructional video instead of step-by-step text is a personal pet peeve. I know it's a lot easier to just record a video to show something like "how to replace the battery on a cordless vacuum" or "removing a sink basin nut" but it's often such a painful experience for consumption (watch a moment, pause, scrub back and watch again, pause, continue, pause, all with potentially gloved hands…
Re: Now I can just print that video
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm on the other end of this in a way. I think it may come from having to read and write all day every day. Sometimes just having somebody yak at me for a few minutes is useful. I really enjoy watching instructional videos, especially for recipes. The demo of the cooking techniques is almost always hard to write or talk about, and easy to show. In the kitchen it works this way for me: 1. Watch the video once or twice…
Your workflow sounds like literal hell to me. I will do anything in my power to get plain text to avoid exactly the experience you are describing!
Most of us, in the IT world, aren't doing that. We're trying to get through this task quickly, and accurately, before moving on to the next one, so for us, we don't need this level of prep/consideration/review.
I'm with you. It's not my style either, after 30+ years in IT. lol
Re: Now I can just print that video
#120Definitely would use this. Instructional video instead of step-by-step text is a personal pet peeve. I know it's a lot easier to just record a video to show something like "how to replace the battery on a cordless vacuum" or "removing a sink basin nut" but it's often such a painful experience for consumption (watch a moment, pause, scrub back and watch again, pause, continue, pause, all with potentially gloved hands…
oh, it depends I understand and agree with you but there are situations where full video is better anyways. example from life: I needed to teardown old laptop to replace thermal paste and I was following some image guide it was all fine until one part stuck and I couldn't figure out what was holding it. there was no way to figure that out from description and images, I needed to find video. I guess what I'm trying to…
Visuals can be useful. I had to look at one just this morning tearing down an old HP Elitebook 8470p. Here I was removing all kinds of screws, when it's just a battery release sliders move, then the entire panel just slides off. doh.
But, most of the time, I just need the list. I don't need a video of someone stepping through some arcane, obscure and rarely needed AD repair. Just gimme the steps and I'll take it from there. :)