Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you normally solve interpersonal conflicts in your life with physical violence? If the answer is no: why do you think it's appropriate to do so when dealing with children? (If the answer is yes, then consider anger management classes, I guess)
>Do you normally solve interpersonal conflicts in your life with physical violence? There are tons of situations where violence is appropriate for interpersonal conflict, usually when someone won't listen to reason. If I went into your house, ignored what you were saying, and then started smashing things or molesting your children, would you just sit there and protest politely?
Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
191–200 of 228 posts
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
> People assume they can reach you by phone these days, especially if you're the parent of young-ish children. Sure. But in this story the school fell back to the "old-fashioned" way and sent someone along to the guy's house. It seems clear that the guy got along just fine without being reachable via telephone.
IIRC the commenter regretted not being reachable by phone, and was cautioning others not to ignore calls that look like spam! But hey, if you think a school will go for cell phone blockers, be sure to try to convince one and let us know how it goes!
That's a non-sequitur. My assertion was that the fellow in the story got along just fine without being reachable by phone. He may have regretted how he came to become unreachable by phone, but he received the relevant information in a timely manner.
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you comparing a human child with dogs, chimps and giraffes? Are you saying it's appropriate to communicate with physical violence in this context? What other human-to-human contexts are there where physical violence or the threat of physical violence is okay? I'm genuinely curious about this worldview, because I personally cannot empathize with this. It's abhorrent to me and my values.
I would argue that basically every human context includes the possibility of physical violence, usually for sufficient transgression the boundaries of others. If you walk out your door start groping people or try to run off someone's child, you will encounter violence pretty fast.
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you normally solve interpersonal conflicts in your life with physical violence? If the answer is no: why do you think it's appropriate to do so when dealing with children? (If the answer is yes, then consider anger management classes, I guess)
The responsibilities and duties one has to their child vs an adult are quite different. Virtually every authority charged with last-resort solving interpersonal conflict issues (government) uses violence, as when all else fails some at least respond to that. The reason why corporal punishment isn't used privately man to man is because we've delegated that to government, who happily sends men with guns to drag people…
And when you say "drag people violently in" I feel like very different definitions of "violence" are getting conflated here. Forcibly moving a child is needed sometimes, and is not corporal punishment.
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
>she has trouble controlling her own students because I believe they themselves have realized she's inconsistent and illogical, so anything goes. They do something, she says something they don't respect, they continue, she gives up This really shouldn't be surprising to anyone. Even 2 year old children can understand authority, power dynamics, and contests of will. For that matter, a 6 month old puppy will understand…
Children are often hardest on their own caregivers though, so the more you look like a parent figure the more they rebel. Of course nowadays corporal punishment is 'child abuse' so the child is emboldened knowing they can do whatever they like, including violence, with absolute impunity from physical pain.
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't refer to "senior year"? I don't think of that as cutesy at all — just descriptive. Do you refer to university by these 'cutesy' names? Or is it grade 13-16?
This is a very American thing. Here in New Zealand, you just refer to the year you're in. No one says "freshman" (whatever that means), or "senior". It's just "I'm in year x". Same at university - I don't know what all the names you give your years refer to exactly, and doesn't it get confusing between 3, 4 and 5 year programmes of study?
But in undergrad, it's all pretty standardized, at least in my experience.
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
corporal punishment is child abuse. It does not mean children can do whatever they like. You might find it difficult to find alternatives, but better alternatives than violence exists. Save your children the costs of therapy as adults, and focus on real emotional health.
Is there a mammal that doesn’t utilize corporal punishment to set boundaries? Does every dog / chimp / giraffe that got nipped by mom for being a brat need therapy?
Also we let/cause lots of things to happen to animals that would likely need therapy if they were humans, so this comparison really doesn't work.
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Do you normally solve interpersonal conflicts in your life with physical violence? There are tons of situations where violence is appropriate for interpersonal conflict, usually when someone won't listen to reason. If I went into your house, ignored what you were saying, and then started smashing things or molesting your children, would you just sit there and protest politely?
When they ask about conflict, they're not talking about a scenario that is already violent. And why are you going to such an unpleasant extreme?
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol you're talking about having respect for someone I assume, but then you assume there's 'intelligence' in finding a random link in the world? Let's say she was a damn genius. Do you expect her to have Google alerts setup for non official spellings of her school districts name? Is a genius supposed to be checking my browser history on my phone? How smart would she have to be to find what I wrote?
>>>>> People will think poorly that I’m talking down a romantic partner >>>> Well, yes. Relationships don’t do well when one of the partners has this much contempt for the other. There’s a difference between knowing in your own mind she’s not the best at her job, and calling her a “ditzy” “illogical” “girl” in public. >>> I don't call her that in public. >> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38524596 is a publicly…
2. Come on, you can figure out what they meant by "public". It's not in the broader spheres of influence that connect to her. She doesn't see this site, this site doesn't see her.
Re: Minnesota middle school students 'seem happy' after cellphone ban
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
When they ask about conflict, they're not talking about a scenario that is already violent. And why are you going to such an unpleasant extreme?
because they dont get to define the scenario in the most favorable conditions if they are claiming violence is never appropriate. Doubly so when they include a bunch of condescension about how anyone who thinks violence has a place should seek therapy.
The earlier poster was arguing that corporal punishment is never appropriate. When they said "better alternatives than violence", they were speaking in the context of punishment.
A scenario about an urgent intervention can't prove them wrong, because it's not related to what they were saying.
> Doubly so when they include a bunch of condescension about how anyone who thinks violence has a place should seek therapy.
Are you actually reading their comments, or are you too busy being righteously mad at them?
They didn't ask if you think violence "has a place". They asked if it's what normally happens for your interpersonal conflicts.
Those two ideas are not at all close.