1. Originally, what was the purpose of having it be a non-profit?
* A legal structure for the joint effort of some tycoons, because they need a structure?
* Tax advantages for the donors?
* Attract some top talent, which happened to be idealistic?
* Some PR shield they thought they might need?
* Genuine interest in the non-profit's charter?
2. Whatever the original purpose of there being a non-profit, what percentage of the current people there are aligned with that? (Rather than preferring being at a for-profit?)
3. With the company higher-profile now, with huge monetary valuation, and a national security/dominance asset, and much of the value committed to MS... who actually wants there to be a non-profit? (Only a handful of idealists, maybe a few structure officials, and maybe MS?)