271–280 of 339 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Howdy, CISO of Anthropic here. I'm not sure what happened in your case but please reach out to support@ and mention my name; we'll respond ASAP.
I am a subscriber, and personally I think it provides results closer to what I am looking for than gpt4.
Cam you share a few examples that might demonstrate this?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is UX: Are you going to have your user work around poor prompting by giving examples with every request? Instead of a UI that's "Describe what you want" you're going to have "Describe what you want and give me some examples because I can't guarantee reliable output otherwise"? Part of LLMs becoming more than toy apps is the former winning out over the latter. Using techniques like chain of thought with…
> Are you going to have your user What fucking user, man? Is it not painfully clear I never spoke in the context of deploying applications? Your issues with this level of prefilling in the context of deployed apps ARE valid but I have no interest in discussing that specific use case and you really should have realized your arguments were context dependent and not actual rebuttals to what I claimed at the start severa…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The only sensible model of "alignment" is "model is aligned to the user", We have already seen that users can become emotionally attached to chat bots. Now imagine if the ToS is "do whatever you want". Automated cat fishing, fully automated girlfriend scams. How about online chat rooms for gambling where half the "users" chatting are actually AI bots slowly convincing people to spend even more money? Take any onlin…
> chatbots encouraging the humans to spend more money ... LLMs absolutely need some restrictions on their use. No, I can honestly say that I do not lose any sleep over this, and I think it's pretty weird that you do. Humans have been fending off human advertisers and scammers since the dawn of the species. We're better at it than you account for.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/people-are-losing-...
The data says we are not that good and getting 30% worse every year.
For coding it is still 10x worse than gpt4. I asked it to write a simple database sync function and it gives me tons of pseudocode like `//sync object with best practices`. When I ask it to give me real code it forgets tons of key aspects.
I find all of them, gpt4 or not, just suck, plain and simple. They are only good for only the most trivial stuff, but any time the complexity rises even a little bit they all start hallucinate wildly and it becomes very clear they're nothing more than just word salad generators.
GPT4 massively sped up my ability to create this.
It is a tool and it takes a lot of time to master it. Took me around 3-6 months of every day use to actually figure out how. You need to go back and try to learn it properly, it's easily 3-5x my work output.
For coding it is still 10x worse than gpt4. I asked it to write a simple database sync function and it gives me tons of pseudocode like `//sync object with best practices`. When I ask it to give me real code it forgets tons of key aspects.
Yeah but to be honest been a pain last days to get gpt 4 to write full pieces of code for more the 10-15 lines. Have to re-ask many times and at some point it forgets my initial specifications.
Ideal output is when nobody elese is using the tool.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> chatbots encouraging the humans to spend more money ... LLMs absolutely need some restrictions on their use. No, I can honestly say that I do not lose any sleep over this, and I think it's pretty weird that you do. Humans have been fending off human advertisers and scammers since the dawn of the species. We're better at it than you account for.
In 2022, reported consumer losses to fraud totaled $8.8 billion — a 30 percent increase from 2021, according to the most recent data from the Federal Trade Commission. The biggest losses were to investment scams, including cryptocurrency schemes, which cost people more than $3.8 billion, double the amount in 2021. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/people-are-losing-... The data says we are not that good and g…
https://cybersecurityventures.com/hackerpocalypse-cybercrime...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hear a lot of complaints about refusals but rarely any examples of said refusals, likely because they are embarrassing. Is it fair to assume that I won't get refusals for code generation and RAG on documentation?
> I hear a lot of complaints about refusals but rarely any examples of said refusals, likely because they are embarrassing. At least circa 8 months ago on ChatGPT (an aeon ago, I recognize), I could readily get it to make gendered jokes about men but would get a refusal when asking for gendered jokes about women. I think things have "improved" in that time, meaning a more equal distribution of verboten topics, but my…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Earlier in the year I had ChatGPT 4 write a large, complicated C program. It did so remarkably well, and most of the code worked without further tweaking. Today I have the same experience. The thing fills in placeholder comments to skip over more difficult regions of the code, and routinely forgets what we were doing. Aside all the recent OpenAI drama, I've been displeased as a paying customer that their products rou…
Could the (perceived) drop in quality be due to ChatGPT switching from GPT-4 to GPT-4-turbo?