51–60 of 339 posts
For coding it is still 10x worse than gpt4. I asked it to write a simple database sync function and it gives me tons of pseudocode like `//sync object with best practices`. When I ask it to give me real code it forgets tons of key aspects.
Except: you can feed it an entire programming language manual, all the docs for all the modules you want to use, and _then_ it's stunningly good, whipping chatgpt4 that same 10x.
[1] https://leanpub.com/racket-ai/read#leanpub-auto-using-the-an...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except: you can feed it an entire programming language manual, all the docs for all the modules you want to use, and _then_ it's stunningly good, whipping chatgpt4 that same 10x.
I honestly don’t have time for that level of prompt engineering. So, chatGPT wins (for me)
For coding it is still 10x worse than gpt4. I asked it to write a simple database sync function and it gives me tons of pseudocode like `//sync object with best practices`. When I ask it to give me real code it forgets tons of key aspects.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, but I do find gpt4 has been increasing the amount of pseudo code recently. I think they are a/b testing me. I find myself asking if how much energy it wasted giving me replies that I then have to tell it to fix.. Which is of course a silly thing to do, but maybe someone at oAI is listening?
If you mean through the user friendly chat GPT website, they're probably making it output as few tokens as possible to cut costs
For coding it is still 10x worse than gpt4. I asked it to write a simple database sync function and it gives me tons of pseudocode like `//sync object with best practices`. When I ask it to give me real code it forgets tons of key aspects.
Except: you can feed it an entire programming language manual, all the docs for all the modules you want to use, and _then_ it's stunningly good, whipping chatgpt4 that same 10x.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, but I do find gpt4 has been increasing the amount of pseudo code recently. I think they are a/b testing me. I find myself asking if how much energy it wasted giving me replies that I then have to tell it to fix.. Which is of course a silly thing to do, but maybe someone at oAI is listening?
If you mean through the user friendly chat GPT website, they're probably making it output as few tokens as possible to cut costs
And still can't be accessed from the EU. Guess Anthropic isn't too keen on complying with our data privacy regulations. Guess we'll stick to OpenAI / Microsoft (who seem to manage).
My take on that is that MS simply accepts being sued and having to pay as part of business. At least, that is how it has been the past few years.