Earlier quoted context omitted.
Homes 'should' be affordable to the people who live there. I.e. I would hope the median housing costs are no more than a third of the median take home pay for the average resident. Now, I'm not going to sit here and advocate for price fixing, but you can do a few things. 1. Ban AirBnB short term rentals by people who do not own and live in the house. 2. Ban foreign ownership of real estate. A nations laws are there f…
These are popular ideas in many places, but here are just some things to consider: 1a) If you town bans short-term rentals but the next town over doesn't, then guess what - the investors just migrate and you haven't actually changed much. 1b) Highest and best use is a really important concept. There are properties that make for not great permanent dwellings but are great short-term rentals. When you put artificial re…
On the contrary: you've changed the housing supply in your town. Sure, some of the money will go to the next town over, but if you're running your town as if it's a business you deserve to end up with a hollow wasteland.
> 2) There is so much money here in the US that even banning foreign ownership doesn't matter much. I live in a tourist / second-home market and it's people from the region who are buying up the investments.
Given what I've heard about the amount of properties being bought up by Chinese investors (which tracks with what else I know about the market and how China has been progressing in recent years, so I have no reason to doubt it), I think it unlikely that, were they all to be forced out of the market, domestic investors would be able to simply fill the vacuum with no net change. Investment dollars chasing real estate may be far more plentiful than is healthy, but they are not infinite.