Earlier quoted context omitted.
> At any event, how is an attendee supposed to assess such a thing? It's not like you can DYOR. That's why I think the cryptobro angle is relevant to the story, because assessing trust in the folks putting on a conference is the way for attendees to figure out if they're likely to be blinded by the lighting or face other issues. And the type of people the whole cryptocurrency and especially NFT scene attract seem at…
"in my opinion to be way more likely" I have no data but still, here's my bias.
If not, by posting your comment just showed a whole bunch of biases that are secretly controlling you.